H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Steffi Graf H2H: 0-4
Steffi Graf holds a 4–0 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Steffi Graf leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1997 Tokyo semifinal 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1997* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | SF | Carpet | Steffi Graf | 6-1 7-5 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1994 | Virginia Slims Championships | WTA Finals | R16 | Carpet | Steffi Graf | 7-5 6-3 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
| May 15, 1994* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | F | Clay | Steffi Graf | 7-6 6-4 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1992* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Steffi Graf | 6-2 6-2 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Steffi Graf | #3 | #1 | 5,028 | 2,600 | 866 | 109 | 88.8% | 22 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 50 | 106 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Steffi Graf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #22 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,037 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 63–6 | 91.3% | #3 | 2,329 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 70–2 | 97.2% | #1 | 2,505 | 1 | 19 |
| 19 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 68–3 | 95.8% | #1 | 2,535 | 5 | 29 |
| 20 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 85–2 | 97.7% | #1 | 2,584 | 8 | 43 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,510 | 9 | 53 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,418 | 10 | 60 |
| 23 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 61–6 | 91.0% | #2 | 2,448 | 11 | 68 |
| 24 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 77–5 | 93.9% | #1 | 2,510 | 14 | 78 |
| 25 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #1 | 2,417 | 15 | 85 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 48–2 | 96.0% | #1 | 2,466 | 18 | 94 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 51–4 | 92.7% | #1 | 2,446 | 21 | 101 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 16–4 | 80.0% | #28 | 2,353 | 21 | 102 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #9 | 2,284 | 21 | 105 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #3 | 2,242 | 22 | 106 |
| 35 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |