H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Zina Garrison H2H: 3-5

Zina Garrison holds a 5–3 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Zina Garrison leads 3–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Zina Garrison won the 1995 Chicago quarterfinal 6-7 6-3 7-6.

NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 11, 1995* Chicago WTA 250 QF Carpet Zina Garrison #24 6-7 6-3 7-6 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #13 Match data
Oct 13, 1994* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #23 6-2 6-3 Zina Garrison #13 Match data
Feb 19, 1994* Oklahoma WTA 250 SF Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #42 6-7 6-3 6-4 Zina Garrison #13 Match data
May 5, 1993* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #37 6-4 6-2 Zina Garrison #21 Match data
Mar 5, 1993* Delray Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #18 7-5 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #31 Match data
Nov 12, 1992* Philadelphia WTA 250 R32 Carpet Zina Garrison #16 7-6 7-6 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #29 Match data
Mar 6, 1992* Boca Raton WTA 1000 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #15 7-5 4-6 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #33 Match data
Oct 18, 1991* Filderstadt WTA 250 R16 Hard Zina Garrison #12 6-3 4-6 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Zina Garrison #318 #4 134 2,142 581 268 68.4% 0 0 0 1 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Zina Garrison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,490 0 0
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1980 2–2 50.0% 1,529 0 1
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0 1981 5–5 50.0% 1,568 0 1
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0 1982 23–15 60.5% 1,853 0 1
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0 1983 38–18 67.9% 1,989 0 1
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1984 47–20 70.1% #9 2,012 0 2
21 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2 1985 51–18 73.9% #8 2,032 0 4
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3 1986 48–22 68.6% #11 1,999 0 5
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3 1987 44–17 72.1% #9 1,987 0 7
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5 1988 49–20 71.0% #9 2,021 0 7
25 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6 1989 60–15 80.0% #4 2,130 0 10
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7 1990 48–18 72.7% #10 2,039 0 11
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7 1991 37–18 67.3% #12 1,963 0 11
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7 1992 36–19 65.5% #18 1,924 0 12
29 1993 43–19 69.4% #14 1,995 0 14
30 1994 24–16 60.0% #24 1,889 0 14
31 1995 25–16 61.0% #22 1,868 0 15
32 1996 1–10 9.1% #273 1,704 0 15
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7