H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Brie Rippner vs Mariaan De Swardt H2H: 2-0
Brie Rippner holds a 2–0 lead over Mariaan De Swardt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brie Rippner leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Brie Rippner won the 2000 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 55
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Brie Rippner | 6-2 6-3 | Mariaan De Swardt | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1999* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Brie Rippner | 6-2 6-2 | Mariaan De Swardt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brie Rippner | #956 | #57 | 485 | 1,650 | 17 | 36 | 32.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mariaan De Swardt | — | — | — | 1,784 | 65 | 81 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brie Rippner | Mariaan De Swardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #154 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #91 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #71 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #262 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #164 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |