H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Bunny Bruning vs Ching Ling Chang H2H: 1-0

Bunny Bruning holds a 1–0 lead over Ching Ling Chang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bunny Bruning leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Bunny Bruning won the 1975 Portland round of 32 6-3 6-3.

USA Age 69 Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bunny Bruning 6-3 6-3 Ching Ling Chang Match data Jan 9, 1975* R32 Portland WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bunny Bruning 1,656 31 63 33.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ching Ling Chang 1,500 13 41 24.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bunny Bruning Ching Ling Chang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1974 2–4 33.3% 1,485 0 0
17 1975 17–15 53.1% 1,588 0 0
18 1976 5–16 23.8% 1,560 0 0
19 1977 6–14 30.0% 1,517 0 0
20 1978 1–10 9.1% 1,491 0 0
21 1979 0–1 0.0% 1,476 0 0
22 1980 0–2 0.0% 1,466 0 0
23 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,451 0 0 1971 0–5 0.0% 1,467 0 0
24 1972 0–3 0.0% 1,442 0 0
25 1973 5–11 31.2% 1,445 0 0
26 1974 8–16 33.3% 1,466 0 0
27 1975 0–6 0.0% 1,411 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bunny Bruning Ching Ling Chang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1974 1486 98.1 +50 33.3% -1.42 +0.88
17 1975 1589 124.8 +39 -87 -6 48.7% +0.04 9–3 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 107.2 +0.71
18 1976 1561 129.6 +49 -75 -17 31.3% -1.13 1–7 (13%) 1–1 -1.77
19 1977 1518 114.2 +47 -59 +19 38.3% -1.08 3–6 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 95.8 +1.49
20 1978 1492 114.5 +34 +46 13.0% -2.26 0–1 0–3 (0%) -0.53
21 1979 1476 +0.15
22 1980 1467 100.7 33.3% -2.00 0–1 -0.19
23 1981 1452 96.1 0.0% -3.50 +0.05 1971 1468 98.2 +43 0.0% -4.00 -0.06
24 1972 1442 90.9 0.0% -4.50 +0.27
25 1973 1445 99.8 +24 +44 34.3% -1.09 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +1.08
26 1974 1467 93.7 +96 -3 35.8% -1.49 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 102.1 +0.93
27 1975 1412 92.1 7.7% -3.31 0–1 1–0 +0.28
Career 1657 123.5 +42 -75 +6 37.0% -0.87 13–18 (42%) 4–11 (27%) 95.5 +0.85 1500 93.3 +96 +8 +44 28.3% -1.86 3–6 (33%) 5–1 (83%) 101.2 +4.81

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.