H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Camila Giorgi holds a 1–0 lead over Alizé Lim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | 6-3 6-2 | Alizé Lim | Match data | May 24, 2016* | R128 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,899 | 211 | 188 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Alizé Lim | #1,196 | #135 | 459 | 1,507 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Alizé Lim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #221 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #215 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #26 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #100 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #33 | 1,829 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,762 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Alizé Lim | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 2011 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2014 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2016 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 131 | 117 | 248 | 52.8% | 38 | 40 | 78 | 48.7% | 42 | 31 | 73 | 57.5% | — | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 13/17 of Alizé Lim's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Alizé Lim | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 19 | 2011 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 7.0 | 53.3% | 66.7% | 28.6% | 33.3% | 0.0% | 48.9% | 26.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 16/16 | 1.7 | 7.4 | 53.8% | 66.1% | 42.4% | 53.5% | 42.4% | 55.1% | 43.4% | 2011 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 67.4% | 48.3% | 25.0% | 43.8% | 60.0% | 40.7% | 49.4% |
| 21 | 2013 | 16/19 | 2.0 | 7.7 | 56.3% | 63.1% | 45.2% | 50.3% | 46.6% | 54.9% | 42.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 44/46 | 3.2 | 8.2 | 53.9% | 70.1% | 49.0% | 53.4% | 44.4% | 60.3% | 43.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 36/47 | 3.1 | 10.5 | 60.2% | 68.8% | 54.7% | 56.5% | 54.2% | 63.0% | 41.9% | 2014 | 2/6 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 65.0% | 56.1% | 42.1% | 52.8% | 22.2% | 51.2% | 39.2% |
| 24 | 2016 | 32/37 | 2.0 | 6.9 | 56.7% | 62.8% | 45.8% | 51.5% | 46.0% | 55.4% | 42.1% | 2015 | 5/5 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 69.9% | 52.6% | 34.5% | 35.5% | 41.4% | 47.1% | 42.8% |
| 25 | 2017 | 27/28 | 2.9 | 6.5 | 56.0% | 64.5% | 47.9% | 50.1% | 45.3% | 57.4% | 42.1% | 2016 | 4/4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 76.2% | 48.2% | 35.7% | 41.2% | 41.0% | 45.4% | 41.7% |
| 26 | 2018 | 43/45 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 59.2% | 67.0% | 49.8% | 51.2% | 49.9% | 60.1% | 44.6% | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 7.0 | 53.2% | 58.5% | 36.1% | 64.3% | 100.0% | 48.1% | 30.6% |
| 27 | 2019 | 25/28 | 2.7 | 6.0 | 55.8% | 62.6% | 46.0% | 48.7% | 52.2% | 55.2% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 19/19 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 56.5% | 64.6% | 47.6% | 49.2% | 45.0% | 57.4% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 34/41 | 3.5 | 6.8 | 54.2% | 67.0% | 48.5% | 46.3% | 49.1% | 58.5% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 30/30 | 2.4 | 7.3 | 54.3% | 66.8% | 44.8% | 45.9% | 48.2% | 56.7% | 43.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 35/35 | 3.0 | 6.3 | 56.0% | 67.8% | 45.8% | 56.8% | 46.0% | 58.2% | 45.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 8/8 | 3.8 | 7.0 | 54.0% | 68.3% | 42.3% | 64.2% | 47.5% | 56.5% | 37.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 366/400 | 2.9 | 7.1 | 56.2% | 66.5% | 47.7% | 51.6% | 47.6% | 58.2% | 43.2% | — | 13/17 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 69.6% | 51.9% | 35.4% | 42.7% | 44.3% | 46.8% | 41.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Alizé Lim | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 2011 | 1486 | 95.9 | -1.46 | -1.61 | 0.519 | 37.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 1524 | 109.2 | -0.06 | -0.52 | 0.966 | 49.3% | -40 | — | +152 | 37.5% | -0.78 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.04 | 2011 | 1487 | 99.7 | -1.34 | -1.91 | 0.834 | 45.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.02 |
| 21 | 2013 | 1578 | 118.6 | -0.28 | -0.45 | 0.945 | 49.0% | -55 | -44 | +82 | 45.2% | -0.64 | 1–3 (25%) | 4–1 (80%) | 101.6 | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 1710 | 139.3 | +3.53 | +0.42 | 1.105 | 51.9% | -5 | -132 | +5 | 57.3% | +0.60 | 9–11 (45%) | 9–9 (50%) | 101.9 | +0.57 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 1728 | 132.8 | +4.03 | +0.45 | 1.135 | 52.6% | -8 | -203 | +75 | 51.9% | +0.18 | 10–8 (56%) | 6–5 (55%) | 99.6 | -0.69 | 2014 | 1455 | 104.0 | -0.94 | -0.42 | 0.804 | 45.1% | +41 | — | — | 26.7% | -2.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.08 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1645 | 130.4 | -0.24 | -0.73 | 0.944 | 49.0% | +10 | -57 | +63 | 44.9% | -0.37 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 102.1 | -2.53 | 2015 | 1463 | 98.2 | -3.06 | -1.99 | 0.810 | 44.7% | — | +43 | — | 38.5% | -1.23 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.20 |
| 25 | 2017 | 1760 | 124.4 | +1.05 | -0.11 | 0.987 | 50.1% | -52 | -146 | +35 | 49.3% | +0.18 | 10–3 (77%) | 5–7 (42%) | 106.2 | -1.25 | 2016 | 1440 | 91.8 | -3.40 | -0.40 | 0.764 | 43.4% | — | — | — | 25.0% | -2.63 | — | — | — | -0.02 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1866 | 142.2 | +3.05 | +1.65 | 1.117 | 52.4% | -27 | -140 | -22 | 61.6% | +0.82 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–1 (80%) | 104.5 | -0.86 | 2017 | 1472 | 95.5 | -2.36 | -0.17 | 0.589 | 41.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 27 | 2019 | 1750 | 138.4 | -0.54 | +0.95 | 0.989 | 49.8% | +3 | — | — | 50.8% | +0.24 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–2 (67%) | 95.3 | -0.70 | 2018 | 1451 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 1737 | 130.8 | +0.83 | -1.43 | 0.968 | 49.3% | +18 | -34 | — | 53.2% | -0.11 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–0 (100%) | 104.5 | -0.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 1829 | 139.7 | +1.63 | +1.37 | 1.062 | 51.2% | -14 | -167 | +30 | 57.8% | +0.65 | 8–4 (67%) | 5–4 (56%) | 103.6 | -1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 1770 | 135.5 | +0.11 | +1.41 | 1.004 | 50.0% | 0 | -96 | +100 | 52.1% | +0.13 | 4–9 (31%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.9 | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 1791 | 142.9 | +1.46 | +1.59 | 1.078 | 51.6% | +17 | -99 | +67 | 59.7% | +0.61 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–4 (60%) | 99.9 | -1.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 1762 | 129.7 | +0.86 | -0.25 | 0.860 | 47.5% | +11 | — | — | 42.1% | -0.68 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | -1.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1900 | 141.2 | +1.54 | +0.55 | 1.033 | 50.7% | -8 | -112 | +54 | 52.9% | +0.22 | 66–68 (49%) | 56–41 (58%) | 104.4 | -2.43 | — | 1508 | 95.5 | -2.65 | -1.11 | 0.780 | 44.1% | +41 | +43 | — | 29.3% | -1.98 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +1.35 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 7 | 8 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 4 | 4 | 8 | Aug 15, 2021 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 5 | 2 | 7 | May 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Sloane Stephens | 4 | 2 | 6 | Feb 25, 2023 | H2H |
| Andrea Petkovic | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 17, 2019 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magda Linette | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 30, 2017 | H2H |
| Timea Babos | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 3, 2016 | H2H |
| Laura Pous-Tio | 1 | 0 | 1 | Aug 2, 2016 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 24, 2016 | H2H |
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | 0 | 1 | 1 | May 18, 2016 | H2H |