H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Annika Beck H2H: 0-1

Annika Beck holds a 1–0 lead over Camila Giorgi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Annika Beck leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Annika Beck won the 2016 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Annika Beck
Germany Age 32 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Giorgi #75 6-2 4-6 6-3 Annika Beck #65 Match data Feb 12, 2017 Q2 Q Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Annika Beck #41 6-4 6-2 Camila Giorgi #49 Match data Apr 21, 2016* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Annika Beck #903 #37 1,455 1,730 90 115 43.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Annika Beck
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2012 2–5 28.6% #78 1,483 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 2013 20–24 45.5% #58 1,608 0 0
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0 2014 20–22 47.6% #53 1,664 0 1
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0 2015 20–20 50.0% #58 1,649 0 2
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0 2016 21–27 43.8% #51 1,659 0 2
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1 2017 7–17 29.2% #178 1,496 0 2
24 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Giorgi Annika Beck
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 9 15 24 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2017 5 10 15 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5% — 51 71 122 41.8% 32 35 67 47.8% 7 9 16 43.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 186/205 of Annika Beck's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Giorgi Annika Beck
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 6/7 0.8 6.0 66.0% 59.3% 35.3% 52.6% 51.1% 51.3% 41.7%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5% 2013 40/44 0.8 4.2 68.6% 57.1% 38.8% 47.7% 46.3% 51.5% 46.6%
20 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4% 2014 40/42 0.7 3.4 74.1% 55.2% 37.4% 49.6% 53.2% 51.1% 48.4%
21 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7% 2015 30/40 0.8 3.5 77.3% 55.7% 45.9% 50.5% 54.6% 53.3% 47.3%
22 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8% 2016 46/48 0.7 2.6 72.1% 56.3% 40.6% 48.1% 55.2% 51.9% 46.6%
23 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9% 2017 24/24 0.3 2.8 72.3% 50.1% 42.2% 42.9% 47.1% 48.2% 42.5%
24 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2% — 186/205 0.7 3.4 72.5% 55.4% 40.4% 48.2% 51.6% 51.4% 46.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Giorgi Annika Beck
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1483 99.9 -3.28 -1.53 0.857 46.7% +35 — — 38.9% -0.67 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.20
19 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2013 1609 119.0 -3.11 +1.67 0.961 49.0% -53 +29 -80 45.6% -0.32 8–9 (47%) 5–7 (42%) 99.7 -0.05
20 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04 2014 1664 130.7 -3.80 +3.73 0.990 49.7% +27 -111 -85 44.7% -0.23 8–4 (67%) 4–7 (36%) 104.7 -1.22
21 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04 2015 1650 124.8 -3.30 +3.51 1.013 50.5% -24 -25 -40 52.1% +0.40 5–11 (31%) 1–2 (33%) 93.7 +0.47
22 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57 2016 1659 128.1 -3.44 +2.56 0.968 49.3% -63 +23 -17 44.3% -0.28 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.9 -0.82
23 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69 2017 1497 103.0 -5.40 -0.53 0.820 45.6% +38 +82 — 28.0% -1.94 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.41
24 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43 — 1731 124.6 -3.67 +2.24 0.954 48.9% -16 +3 -57 44.3% -0.33 29–34 (46%) 16–20 (44%) 99.1 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.