H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Barbora Strycova H2H: 1-2

Barbora Strycova holds a 2–1 lead over Camila Giorgi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Barbora Strycova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2018 Prague Open first round 6-0 2-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Barbora Strycova
CZE Age 40 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Giorgi #58 6-0 2-6 6-2 Barbora Strycova #26 Match data May 2, 2018* R32 Prague Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Barbora Strycova #41 6-2 7-5 Camila Giorgi #35 Match data Aug 27, 2015* R32 New Haven Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Barbora Strycova #58 6-1 6-3 Camila Giorgi #148 Match data Apr 4, 2012* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Barbora Strycova #430 #16 2,295 1,888 288 300 49.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Barbora Strycova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #142 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 14–16 46.7% #57 1,560 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 2005 8–15 34.8% #137 1,488 0 0
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,476 0 0
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0 2007 2–5 28.6% #151 1,455 0 0
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0 2008 5–9 35.7% #75 1,512 0 0
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1 2009 13–20 39.4% #66 1,523 0 0
24 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1 2010 16–22 42.1% #67 1,591 0 0
25 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1 2011 24–26 48.0% #44 1,631 0 1
26 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2 2012 13–21 38.2% #89 1,564 0 1
27 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2 2013 5–6 45.5% #94 1,583 0 1
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2 2014 29–23 55.8% #25 1,750 0 1
29 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3 2015 31–26 54.4% #42 1,710 0 1
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3 2016 36–24 60.0% #20 1,788 0 1
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4 2017 42–24 63.6% #23 1,869 0 2
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4 2018 24–23 51.1% #33 1,766 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 19–20 48.7% #33 1,714 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 5–9 35.7% #37 1,680 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2021 0–2 0.0% #340 1,650 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2023 2–7 22.2% #430 1,600 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Giorgi Barbora Strycova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 2 8 10 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2008 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 5 11 16 31.3% 9 9 18 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2011 17 16 33 51.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 19 14 33 57.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 9 3 12 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 2016 22 18 40 55.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
31 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2017 30 16 46 65.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
32 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 5 12 17 29.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5% — — — — — 164 175 339 48.4% 77 86 163 47.2% 46 36 82 56.1% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 485/587 of Barbora Strycova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Giorgi Barbora Strycova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 1.0 4.0 57.3% 57.8% 53.7% 56.3% 35.3% 56.1% 42.9%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/30 1.0 4.4 54.2% 63.7% 41.8% 48.3% 52.7% 53.8% 45.4%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5% 2005 3/23 2.3 3.7 55.5% 53.2% 40.0% 42.9% 55.6% 47.5% 37.9%
20 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7% 2007 3/7 1.0 3.7 67.6% 55.3% 40.0% 61.6% 52.8% 50.3% 39.7%
22 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8% 2008 13/14 1.5 1.6 70.6% 55.6% 41.6% 47.5% 42.6% 51.2% 42.5%
23 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9% 2009 24/33 1.0 2.1 68.2% 56.5% 46.4% 49.1% 49.5% 53.3% 41.7%
24 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1% 2010 36/38 1.5 1.9 66.1% 59.3% 47.9% 56.1% 43.5% 55.5% 43.7%
25 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1% 2011 46/50 1.6 1.7 65.6% 58.1% 45.4% 49.8% 53.5% 53.5% 44.3%
26 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6% 2012 30/34 2.2 2.6 63.3% 56.4% 41.9% 50.2% 51.0% 50.9% 42.0%
27 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3% 2013 7/11 2.4 2.7 65.0% 61.8% 45.8% 56.4% 54.5% 56.2% 41.1%
28 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2% 2014 42/52 2.4 2.7 60.7% 62.8% 46.2% 56.3% 47.1% 56.3% 41.1%
29 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1% 2015 45/57 2.2 2.6 62.8% 63.8% 49.0% 56.2% 50.8% 57.8% 43.0%
30 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5% 2016 55/60 2.4 2.2 66.8% 62.2% 48.0% 54.2% 52.3% 57.6% 45.7%
31 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1% 2017 66/66 2.2 2.1 65.7% 62.6% 47.3% 54.7% 53.0% 57.2% 46.7%
32 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4% 2018 45/47 2.0 3.0 64.1% 64.4% 48.2% 55.6% 48.1% 58.6% 43.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 39/39 1.7 2.6 64.2% 62.6% 48.2% 52.2% 41.8% 57.3% 42.8%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 1.4 2.3 68.0% 55.7% 51.2% 49.2% 46.7% 54.0% 41.1%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 0.0 4.0 64.6% 54.0% 36.8% 33.9% 28.6% 47.0% 39.3%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 9/9 2.6 3.2 61.0% 59.1% 45.6% 48.4% 51.5% 53.9% 42.4%
Career — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2% — 485/588 2.0 2.4 64.8% 60.9% 46.8% 53.3% 49.3% 55.8% 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Giorgi Barbora Strycova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1486 99.7 -1.59 +0.58 0.975 49.7% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.15
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1560 125.3 -0.39 +0.06 0.982 49.5% +6 +47 — 44.6% -0.23 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 102.3 +0.54
19 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2005 1488 101.4 -2.03 -2.32 0.722 43.0% -20 +118 — 38.9% -0.96 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +1.31
20 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04 2006 1476 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.03
21 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04 2007 1455 104.6 -1.82 -2.44 0.799 45.3% — +102 — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
22 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57 2008 1513 108.9 -1.54 +0.34 0.872 46.8% -67 +39 +49 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 99.4 -0.68
23 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69 2009 1523 111.3 -1.84 -2.43 0.894 47.3% -37 +41 +30 38.5% -0.94 8–4 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 -0.27
24 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53 2010 1592 126.0 -0.57 -0.21 0.981 49.4% -74 +11 0 42.5% -0.22 6–5 (55%) 1–7 (13%) 99.2 -0.73
25 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25 2011 1631 125.9 -1.85 +0.89 0.952 48.9% -4 -38 -72 45.6% -0.32 10–6 (63%) 7–7 (50%) 106.3 +0.05
26 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86 2012 1564 122.3 -2.92 -0.52 0.856 46.3% 0 +80 — 39.0% -0.84 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 97.6 -1.01
27 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70 2013 1584 113.7 -0.48 -1.63 0.938 48.6% -4 +37 — 44.0% -0.16 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.06
28 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95 2014 1750 131.4 +0.37 -1.53 0.940 48.6% -58 -180 +19 52.5% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 9–1 (90%) 113.9 -1.52
29 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02 2015 1710 133.4 -0.27 +1.56 1.019 50.5% +15 -127 +9 52.8% +0.37 6–7 (46%) 4–12 (25%) 94.5 -0.44
30 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10 2016 1788 148.3 +1.78 +2.95 1.078 51.5% -21 -76 +12 59.3% +0.56 10–8 (56%) 9–4 (69%) 106.8 -1.68
31 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28 2017 1870 145.4 +1.20 +3.47 1.090 51.8% +2 -113 -62 59.7% +0.62 10–8 (56%) 8–3 (73%) 101.9 -1.07
32 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16 2018 1766 138.7 +1.73 +0.59 1.042 50.7% -20 -44 +84 50.9% +0.05 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) 93.8 +0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1715 131.2 +1.35 +0.33 1.004 50.0% -91 -3 +218 48.9% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 101.4 -0.77
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1680 123.1 -1.62 -0.90 0.894 47.8% -51 +11 — 34.4% -0.91 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 102.3 +0.18
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1650 103.2 -2.95 -1.14 0.741 43.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — +0.07
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1600 110.3 -1.50 -0.90 0.921 48.4% — +75 +313 28.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 +0.10
Career — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43 — 1889 135.3 -0.01 +0.73 0.985 49.6% -21 -6 +60 47.9% -0.12 94–77 (55%) 63–73 (46%) 103.4 -0.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.