H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 1-2

Kiki Bertens holds a 2–1 lead over Camila Giorgi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay, while Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2019 Qatar Open first round 0-6 7-6(7) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kiki Bertens #8 0-6 7-6(7) 6-4 Camila Giorgi #28 Match data Feb 13, 2019* R32 Qatar Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Kiki Bertens #58 6-4 6-1 Camila Giorgi #44 Match data May 26, 2016* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Camila Giorgi #35 6-2 6-4 Kiki Bertens #132 Match data Jun 13, 2015* SF Libéma Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,004 216 172 55.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Kiki Bertens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,580 0 1
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,551 0 1
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,579 0 1
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1
24 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1 2016 26–20 56.5% #22 1,689 0 2
25 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,696 0 5
26 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2 2018 46–23 66.7% #9 1,911 0 8
27 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2 2019 57–26 68.7% #9 1,897 0 10
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,882 0 11
29 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3 2021 1–8 11.1% #25 1,733 0 11
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Giorgi Kiki Bertens
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
22 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 7 14 21 33.3% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2017 7 16 23 30.4% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2018 26 15 41 63.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 30 18 48 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
28 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 10 3 13 76.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5% — — — — — 98 107 205 47.8% 95 45 140 67.9% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 1 4 75.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Giorgi Kiki Bertens
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5% 2011 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.7% 61.1% 32.3% 50.0% 42.9% 47.8% 40.9%
20 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4% 2012 23/23 2.9 4.1 60.5% 65.3% 41.1% 49.3% 48.2% 55.7% 42.3%
21 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7% 2013 30/33 2.2 5.5 57.6% 61.8% 42.9% 51.9% 45.5% 54.1% 43.7%
22 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8% 2014 22/25 2.7 4.0 58.1% 60.8% 44.5% 49.6% 41.8% 53.8% 45.8%
23 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9% 2015 19/24 1.9 5.1 63.9% 59.1% 51.6% 53.8% 57.3% 56.1% 36.8%
24 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1% 2016 45/46 3.8 3.4 60.1% 67.4% 47.6% 55.6% 44.9% 59.0% 46.0%
25 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1% 2017 54/56 4.5 4.4 55.5% 71.4% 43.7% 54.1% 50.0% 59.1% 45.9%
26 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6% 2018 64/69 4.8 4.0 58.0% 69.1% 47.9% 51.8% 51.7% 60.0% 46.8%
27 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3% 2019 76/83 5.6 4.4 57.1% 72.6% 47.2% 58.5% 48.8% 61.8% 43.6%
28 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2% 2020 19/19 4.2 3.8 63.7% 68.3% 43.5% 59.6% 57.0% 59.1% 47.0%
29 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1% 2021 8/9 1.5 4.8 64.5% 58.8% 40.4% 44.2% 43.1% 51.9% 37.9%
30 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2% — 361/388 4.0 4.3 58.6% 67.8% 45.8% 54.1% 49.0% 58.5% 44.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Giorgi Kiki Bertens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2011 1494 97.6 +1.77 -1.03 0.783 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.13
20 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04 2012 1580 118.0 +0.05 -1.16 0.955 49.1% -24 +11 +4 47.1% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.6 -0.87
21 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04 2013 1551 121.8 -1.34 -0.74 0.952 48.8% +33 +22 — 44.6% -0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.04
22 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57 2014 1580 124.4 -1.78 +0.96 0.993 49.7% -23 +77 — 47.2% -0.02 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.24
23 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69 2015 1520 114.8 -1.77 -2.92 0.837 46.5% -52 +93 +82 34.5% -1.07 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 95.7 -1.23
24 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53 2016 1689 132.6 +2.91 +1.95 1.122 52.4% -129 +137 -72 54.6% +0.61 6–5 (55%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.68
25 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25 2017 1696 135.9 +2.41 +1.24 1.122 52.6% -173 +308 -130 54.9% +0.68 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +1.57
26 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86 2018 1911 154.4 +3.14 +4.20 1.171 53.3% -97 +80 -217 63.3% +1.14 14–12 (54%) 10–15 (40%) 100.3 -1.83
27 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70 2019 1897 153.7 +4.80 +1.58 1.142 52.4% -14 +155 -90 65.1% +0.95 18–13 (58%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 +0.54
28 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95 2020 1883 144.7 +1.90 +2.64 1.150 53.1% +54 +91 — 65.1% +1.09 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +1.01
29 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02 2021 1733 102.2 -2.11 -1.63 0.787 44.9% +114 +208 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.66
30 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43 — 2004 143.8 +2.04 +1.38 1.074 51.4% -53 +144 -88 55.1% +0.46 62–63 (50%) 46–50 (48%) 100.2 -0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.