H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Lauren Davis H2H: 1-2

Lauren Davis holds a 2–1 lead over Camila Giorgi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lauren Davis leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Camila Giorgi won the 2022 Birmingham second round 3-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
Italy Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camila Giorgi #26 3-6 7-5 6-2 Lauren Davis #108 Match data Jun 17, 2022* R16 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Lauren Davis #122 6-4 6-4 Camila Giorgi #77 Match data Jul 23, 2016* QF Washington Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lauren Davis #72 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 Camila Giorgi #79 Match data Sep 12, 2013* R32 Quebec City International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,899 211 188 52.9% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Lauren Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,523 0 0 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,578 0 0 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,709 0 0 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,727 0 1 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1
24 2016 16–20 44.4% #82 1,645 0 1 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1
25 2017 15–13 53.6% #78 1,759 0 1 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1
26 2018 29–16 64.4% #26 1,866 0 2 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1
27 2019 13–15 46.4% #100 1,749 0 2 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,736 0 2 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1
29 2021 24–17 58.5% #33 1,829 0 3 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,769 0 3 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,790 0 4 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,762 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camila Giorgi Lauren Davis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 2012 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2013 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2014 17 11 28 60.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2015 17 15 32 53.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2016 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2017 7 7 14 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2018 15 9 24 62.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2019 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2021 16 10 26 61.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2023 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2024 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 131 117 248 52.8% 38 40 78 48.7% 42 31 73 57.5% — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 366/400 of Camila Giorgi's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Camila Giorgi Lauren Davis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 7.0 53.3% 66.7% 28.6% 33.3% 0.0% 48.9% 26.5% 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9%
20 2012 16/16 1.7 7.4 53.8% 66.1% 42.4% 53.5% 42.4% 55.1% 43.4% 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8%
21 2013 16/19 2.0 7.7 56.3% 63.1% 45.2% 50.3% 46.6% 54.9% 42.7% 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7%
22 2014 44/46 3.2 8.2 53.9% 70.1% 49.0% 53.4% 44.4% 60.3% 43.8% 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2015 36/47 3.1 10.5 60.2% 68.8% 54.7% 56.5% 54.2% 63.0% 41.9% 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6%
24 2016 32/37 2.0 6.9 56.7% 62.8% 45.8% 51.5% 46.0% 55.4% 42.1% 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6%
25 2017 27/28 2.9 6.5 56.0% 64.5% 47.9% 50.1% 45.3% 57.4% 42.1% 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3%
26 2018 43/45 3.5 5.0 59.2% 67.0% 49.8% 51.2% 49.9% 60.1% 44.6% 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2%
27 2019 25/28 2.7 6.0 55.8% 62.6% 46.0% 48.7% 52.2% 55.2% 44.3% 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0%
28 2020 19/19 2.7 6.7 56.5% 64.6% 47.6% 49.2% 45.0% 57.4% 41.2% 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7%
29 2021 34/41 3.5 6.8 54.2% 67.0% 48.5% 46.3% 49.1% 58.5% 44.1% 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8%
30 2022 30/30 2.4 7.3 54.3% 66.8% 44.8% 45.9% 48.2% 56.7% 43.5% 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7%
31 2023 35/35 3.0 6.3 56.0% 67.8% 45.8% 56.8% 46.0% 58.2% 45.1% 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8%
32 2024 8/8 3.8 7.0 54.0% 68.3% 42.3% 64.2% 47.5% 56.5% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 366/400 2.9 7.1 56.2% 66.5% 47.7% 51.6% 47.6% 58.2% 43.2% — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camila Giorgi Lauren Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
19 2011 1486 95.9 -1.46 -1.61 0.519 37.2% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03
20 2012 1524 109.2 -0.06 -0.52 0.966 49.3% -40 — +152 37.5% -0.78 0–2 1–1 — +0.04 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07
21 2013 1578 118.6 -0.28 -0.45 0.945 49.0% -55 -44 +82 45.2% -0.64 1–3 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 101.6 -0.04 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82
22 2014 1710 139.3 +3.53 +0.42 1.105 51.9% -5 -132 +5 57.3% +0.60 9–11 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 101.9 +0.57 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31
23 2015 1728 132.8 +4.03 +0.45 1.135 52.6% -8 -203 +75 51.9% +0.18 10–8 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 99.6 -0.69 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39
24 2016 1645 130.4 -0.24 -0.73 0.944 49.0% +10 -57 +63 44.9% -0.37 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 102.1 -2.53 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 2017 1760 124.4 +1.05 -0.11 0.987 50.1% -52 -146 +35 49.3% +0.18 10–3 (77%) 5–7 (42%) 106.2 -1.25 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90
26 2018 1866 142.2 +3.05 +1.65 1.117 52.4% -27 -140 -22 61.6% +0.82 6–5 (55%) 4–1 (80%) 104.5 -0.86 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17
27 2019 1750 138.4 -0.54 +0.95 0.989 49.8% +3 — — 50.8% +0.24 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.3 -0.70 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59
28 2020 1737 130.8 +0.83 -1.43 0.968 49.3% +18 -34 — 53.2% -0.11 6–5 (55%) 6–0 (100%) 104.5 -0.95 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24
29 2021 1829 139.7 +1.63 +1.37 1.062 51.2% -14 -167 +30 57.8% +0.65 8–4 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.02 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58
30 2022 1770 135.5 +0.11 +1.41 1.004 50.0% 0 -96 +100 52.1% +0.13 4–9 (31%) 3–5 (38%) 93.9 +0.10 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30
31 2023 1791 142.9 +1.46 +1.59 1.078 51.6% +17 -99 +67 59.7% +0.61 3–5 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 99.9 -1.28 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00
32 2024 1762 129.7 +0.86 -0.25 0.860 47.5% +11 — — 42.1% -0.68 1–2 (33%) — — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1900 141.2 +1.54 +0.55 1.033 50.7% -8 -112 +54 52.9% +0.22 66–68 (49%) 56–41 (58%) 104.4 -2.43 — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.