H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Camila Giorgi vs Mona Barthel H2H: 1-1
Camila Giorgi and Mona Barthel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mona Barthel leads 1–0 on clay, while Camila Giorgi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mona Barthel won the 2017 Prague quarterfinal 7-6(0) 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2017* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Mona Barthel | 7-6(0) 7-6(6) | Camila Giorgi | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2016* | Seoul | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Camila Giorgi | 2-6 6-1 6-4 | Mona Barthel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Giorgi | #116 | #26 | 1,978 | 1,875 | 204 | 184 | 52.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mona Barthel | #223 | #23 | 1,762 | 1,841 | 151 | 179 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Giorgi | Mona Barthel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #69 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #34 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #34 | 1,646 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2015 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,672 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #78 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #158 | 1,555 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,600 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2019 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #100 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #76 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #183 | 1,552 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #33 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #66 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #275 | 1,458 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2023 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #53 | 1,788 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #116 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,525 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,544 | 0 | 4 |