H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Camila Giorgi vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-3

Venus Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Camila Giorgi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2023 Birmingham third round 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camila Giorgi
ITA Age 34 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2023* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Venus Williams #697 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(6) Camila Giorgi #48 Match data
Aug 30, 2018* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Venus Williams #16 6-4 7-5 Camila Giorgi #40 Match data
Jan 24, 2015* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Venus Williams #18 4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 Camila Giorgi #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Camila Giorgi #116 #26 1,978 1,875 204 184 52.6% 0 1 0 2 1 4
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camila Giorgi Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #151 1,486 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2012 6–10 37.5% #75 1,524 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2013 8–11 42.1% #98 1,579 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2014 27–19 58.7% #34 1,710 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2015 26–21 55.3% #35 1,730 0 1 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2016 14–19 42.4% #82 1,638 0 1 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2017 15–12 55.6% #78 1,778 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2018 28–15 65.1% #26 1,865 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2019 12–15 44.4% #100 1,725 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2020 10–9 52.6% #76 1,726 0 2 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2021 21–16 56.8% #33 1,799 0 3 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2022 14–16 46.7% #66 1,763 0 3 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2023 20–15 57.1% #53 1,788 0 4 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2024 3–5 37.5% #116 1,760 0 4 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47