H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 1-1
Camila Osorio and Caroline Garcia are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on clay, while Caroline Garcia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camila Osorio won the 2023 Rome third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2023* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Camila Osorio | 6-4 6-4 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2023* | Lyon | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-2 6-2 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Caroline Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |