H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Camila Osorio vs Vera Zvonareva
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Camila Osorio vs Vera Zvonareva.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Vera Zvonareva | #307 | #2 | 7,935 | 2,077 | 459 | 268 | 63.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camila Osorio | Vera Zvonareva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #45 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #13 | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 54–27 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,935 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #24 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,935 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 49–18 | 73.1% | #2 | 2,051 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 54–22 | 71.1% | #7 | 1,946 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,808 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,743 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #185 | 1,671 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #200 | 1,676 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,702 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #159 | 1,680 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #164 | 1,731 | 0 | 12 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #81 | 1,753 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #357 | 1,711 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #272 | 1,683 | 0 | 12 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #307 | 1,646 | 0 | 12 |