H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Camille Benjamin vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-2
Andrea Temesvari holds a 2–1 lead over Camille Benjamin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1984 Brighton third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 60
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1984* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Temesvari | 6-3 6-4 | Camille Benjamin | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1983* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Camille Benjamin | 7-6 3-0 (ret.) | Andrea Temesvari | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1983* | Hittfield | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Andrea Temesvari | 6-3 6-2 | Camille Benjamin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camille Benjamin | #1,000 | #27 | 13 | 1,834 | 177 | 223 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrea Temesvari | #932 | #7 | 109 | 2,021 | 185 | 178 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camille Benjamin | Andrea Temesvari | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 11–6 | 64.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1982 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1983 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–15 | 73.7% | — | 1,988 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1984 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #14 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1985 | 22–29 | 43.1% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #16 | 1,847 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #79 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1987 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #67 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,762 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #43 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #251 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,616 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #133 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,487 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #181 | 1,537 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #940 | 1,533 | 0 | 5 |