H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Camille Benjamin vs Debbie Spence Nasim H2H: 2-1
Camille Benjamin holds a 2–1 lead over Debbie Spence Nasim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on carpet, while Debbie Spence Nasim leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Debbie Spence Nasim won the 1987 Hilton Head second round 6-3 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Age 58
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1987* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Debbie Spence Nasim | 6-3 3-6 7-6 | Camille Benjamin | Match data |
| Jan 24, 1986* | Wichita | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Camille Benjamin | 6-4 6-4 | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
| Jan 31, 1985* | Marco Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Camille Benjamin | (w/o) | Debbie Spence Nasim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camille Benjamin | #1,000 | #27 | 13 | 1,834 | 177 | 223 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Debbie Spence Nasim | — | — | — | 1,837 | 56 | 62 | 47.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camille Benjamin | Debbie Spence Nasim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1982 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 9–7 | 56.2% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1983 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1984 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–22 | 37.1% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 22–29 | 43.1% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #79 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1987 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #67 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #251 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |