H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Camille Benjamin vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-1

Camille Benjamin and Mareen Louie Harper are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1989 San Antonio round of 16 6-2 6-7 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camille Benjamin #98 6-2 6-7 6-1 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Mar 3, 1989* R16 San Antonio WTA 250 Hard
Mareen Louie Harper 7-5 3-6 6-3 Camille Benjamin #34 Match data Jan 25, 1985* R16 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camille Benjamin #1,000 #27 13 1,820 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,910 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camille Benjamin Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,568 0 0
19 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,628 0 0 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,714 0 0
20 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,671 0 0
23 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,776 0 2
25 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,679 0 2
26 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1993 1–3 25.0% #276 1,516 0 0 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,536 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camille Benjamin Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8% — 104 118 222 46.8% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camille Benjamin Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.36
16 1982 1690 123.4 — — — — +57 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 +0.11 1977 1520 116.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1983 1715 124.3 — — — — -16 -37 -116 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.37 1978 1589 122.4 — — — — +31 -31 — 34.1% -1.25 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) 108.1 -0.33
18 1984 1767 138.8 — — — — -53 -4 -96 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.27 1979 1568 121.3 — — — — +25 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
19 1985 1629 116.8 — — — — +24 +2 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.47 1980 1714 128.5 — — — — -41 -153 -36 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.6 +1.57
20 1986 1608 118.6 — — — — -3 +36 +20 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.65 1981 1743 134.3 — — — — -2 — -72 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 -1.63
21 1987 1654 128.3 — — — — -3 -8 +7 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 +0.06 1982 1655 124.8 — — — — -27 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.27
22 1988 1600 120.9 — — — — -4 +28 +19 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.02 1983 1671 132.0 — — — — -14 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -0.99
23 1989 1652 128.9 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.55 1984 1733 127.5 — — — — +24 — -94 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.67
24 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55 1985 1777 143.7 — — — — +52 — -157 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.01
25 1991 1559 107.1 — — — — -30 +86 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1986 1680 121.2 — — — — +20 — -65 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.39
26 1992 1527 113.1 — — — — -18 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34 1987 1624 119.5 — — — — +6 — -17 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.33
27 1993 1516 101.5 — — — — -9 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04 1988 1614 129.1 — — — — +11 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.29
28 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11 1989 1576 117.3 — — — — -17 — -21 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.33
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1590 128.4 — — — — +10 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.4 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1821 128.3 — — — — -1 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21 — 1911 135.2 — — — — +7 -78 -59 42.4% -0.57 76–56 (58%) 40–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.