H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Camille Benjamin vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0

Camille Benjamin holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1987 Oklahoma round of 16 6-4 4-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camille Benjamin #77 6-4 4-6 7-5 Nathalie Herreman #42 Match data Feb 13, 1987* R16 Oklahoma WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camille Benjamin #1,000 #27 13 1,820 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camille Benjamin Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,628 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1993 1–3 25.0% #276 1,516 0 0 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camille Benjamin Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camille Benjamin Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1690 123.4 — — — — +57 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 +0.11 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 1983 1715 124.3 — — — — -16 -37 -116 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.37 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1984 1767 138.8 — — — — -53 -4 -96 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.27 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1985 1629 116.8 — — — — +24 +2 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.47 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1986 1608 118.6 — — — — -3 +36 +20 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.65 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1987 1654 128.3 — — — — -3 -8 +7 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 +0.06 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1988 1600 120.9 — — — — -4 +28 +19 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.02 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1989 1652 128.9 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.55 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1991 1559 107.1 — — — — -30 +86 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1992 1527 113.1 — — — — -18 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1993 1516 101.5 — — — — -9 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
Career — 1821 128.3 — — — — -1 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.