H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Camille Benjamin vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 1-0
Camille Benjamin holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1987 Oklahoma fourth round 6-4 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1987* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Camille Benjamin | 6-4 4-6 7-5 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camille Benjamin | #1,000 | #27 | 13 | 1,834 | 177 | 223 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camille Benjamin | Nathalie Herreman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 22–29 | 43.1% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #79 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #67 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #251 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |