H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Camille Benjamin vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 1-1
Camille Benjamin and Nicole Jagerman are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on carpet, while Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Jagerman won the 1990 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1990* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicole Jagerman | 6-3 6-3 | Camille Benjamin | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1989* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Camille Benjamin | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Nicole Jagerman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camille Benjamin | #1,000 | #27 | 13 | 1,834 | 177 | 223 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camille Benjamin | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1983 | 22–25 | 46.8% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 22–29 | 43.1% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #79 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #67 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #91 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #251 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #276 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #251 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |