H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Camille Benjamin vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 2-0

Camille Benjamin holds a 2–0 lead over Sandra Cecchini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Camille Benjamin leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Camille Benjamin won the 1990 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Camille Benjamin #114 6-3 6-1 Sandra Cecchini #24 Match data Jun 27, 1990* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Camille Benjamin #34 7-5 6-3 Sandra Cecchini #58 Match data Jan 30, 1985* R64 Marco Island WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Camille Benjamin #1,000 #27 13 1,820 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Camille Benjamin Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,628 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1993 1–3 25.0% #276 1,516 0 0 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Camille Benjamin Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Camille Benjamin Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1690 123.4 — — — — +57 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 +0.11 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 1983 1715 124.3 — — — — -16 -37 -116 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.37 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1984 1767 138.8 — — — — -53 -4 -96 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.27 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1985 1629 116.8 — — — — +24 +2 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.47 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1986 1608 118.6 — — — — -3 +36 +20 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.65 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1987 1654 128.3 — — — — -3 -8 +7 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 +0.06 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1988 1600 120.9 — — — — -4 +28 +19 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.02 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1989 1652 128.9 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.55 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1991 1559 107.1 — — — — -30 +86 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1992 1527 113.1 — — — — -18 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1993 1516 101.5 — — — — -9 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1821 128.3 — — — — -1 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.