H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Camille Pin vs Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro H2H: 1-1
Camille Pin and Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro leads 1–0 on clay, while Camille Pin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro won the 2008 Strasbourg third round 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2008* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Camille Pin | Match data |
| Aug 11, 2005* | Stockholm | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Camille Pin | 6-2 6-2 | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Camille Pin | #1,143 | #61 | 752 | 1,619 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | #183 | #61 | 760 | 1,599 | 44 | 80 | 35.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Camille Pin | Stéphanie Cohen-Aloro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #169 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #68 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #112 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #97 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #159 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #113 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #76 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #105 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #122 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |