H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Cammy Macgregor vs Emiko Okagawa H2H: 1-0
Cammy Macgregor holds a 1–0 lead over Emiko Okagawa in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cammy Macgregor leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cammy Macgregor won the 1987 Taipei third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 61
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1987* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Cammy Macgregor | 6-3 6-3 | Emiko Okagawa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cammy Macgregor | #625 | #75 | 14 | 1,605 | 48 | 87 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emiko Okagawa | — | — | — | 1,523 | 18 | 39 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cammy Macgregor | Emiko Okagawa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #77 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #188 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #166 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |