H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Cammy Macgregor vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-1

Cammy Macgregor holds a 2–1 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cammy Macgregor leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1990 Oklahoma round of 32 6-2 7-5.

USA Age 57 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 1
3 main-draw meetings
JPN Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nana Smith #94 6-2 7-5 Cammy Macgregor #108 Match data Feb 22, 1990* R32 Oklahoma Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Cammy Macgregor #96 6-4 6-3 Nana Smith #104 Match data Jan 10, 1990* R64 Sydney International Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Cammy Macgregor #138 3-6 7-6 6-4 Nana Smith #140 Match data Apr 27, 1989* R32 Taipei WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cammy Macgregor #625 #75 14 1,604 48 87 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nana Smith #669 #51 332 1,649 65 114 36.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cammy Macgregor Nana Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 4–3 57.1% 1,509 0 0
17 1986 5–9 35.7% #77 1,534 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #201 1,495 0 0
18 1987 11–17 39.3% #134 1,521 0 0 1989 7–11 38.9% #103 1,587 0 0
19 1988 4–11 26.7% #188 1,503 0 0 1990 9–16 36.0% #113 1,541 0 0
20 1989 8–9 47.1% #96 1,577 0 0 1991 7–13 35.0% #144 1,528 0 0
21 1990 8–16 33.3% #119 1,518 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #118 1,557 0 0
22 1991 4–7 36.4% #166 1,520 0 0 1993 1–11 8.3% #317 1,444 0 0
23 1992 2–6 25.0% #198 1,515 0 0 1994 9–7 56.2% #58 1,578 0 0
24 1993 2–9 18.2% #194 1,456 0 0 1995 7–13 35.0% #128 1,544 0 0
25 1996 13–13 50.0% #70 1,601 0 0
26 1997 4–12 25.0% #105 1,542 0 0
27 1998 4–8 33.3% #117 1,538 0 0
28 1999 0–3 0.0% #134 1,521 0 0
29 2000 0–2 0.0% #218 1,499 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cammy Macgregor Nana Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1987 9 9 18 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1990 4 8 12 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1991 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 0 9 9 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 6 10 16 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1999 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 32 48 80 40.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 6 16 22 27.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 52 84 136 38.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 8 10 18 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cammy Macgregor Nana Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1510 98.3 60.0% +0.13 0–1 +0.27
17 1986 1535 112.3 +5 +100 38.7% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.56 1988 1496 102.5 0.0% -3.50 -0.11
18 1987 1522 96.7 +33 -14 37.7% -0.89 4–3 (57%) 1–3 (25%) 99.9 +3.39 1989 1588 139.3 +6 45.7% -0.22 3–7 (30%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
19 1988 1504 126.9 +43 37.1% -0.89 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.1 +0.12 1990 1541 113.3 +33 -2 38.9% -0.89 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 96.2 +1.12
20 1989 1577 119.8 +24 43.9% -0.68 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.5 +0.60 1991 1529 118.1 +48 37.0% -0.87 3–3 (50%) 0–1 +0.61
21 1990 1518 107.0 +28 -16 38.2% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 97.7 +0.99 1992 1557 108.5 +41 52.6% +0.32 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) +0.97
22 1991 1521 113.3 +17 -24 41.4% -0.34 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.55 1993 1444 90.0 +16 14.8% -2.37 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 96.7 +0.20
23 1992 1515 116.8 +43 33.3% -1.11 0–2 -0.36 1994 1579 128.2 -1 55.3% +0.37 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) +0.70
24 1993 1456 107.1 +39 +24 32.1% -1.04 1–5 (17%) +0.31 1995 1545 112.9 0 -88 40.8% -0.65 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 +0.66
25 1996 1602 121.7 +24 47.7% -0.11 8–5 (62%) 3–1 (75%) 107.0 +1.18
26 1997 1543 108.6 +33 34.3% -1.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.08
27 1998 1538 116.7 +45 40.0% -1.00 2–4 (33%) 2–0 -0.13
28 1999 1522 112.5 +37 14.3% -1.86 0–1 0–1 -0.63
29 2000 1499 99.7 20.0% -2.60 0–1 -0.03
Career 1605 115.1 +29 -18 +24 39.3% -0.82 16–29 (36%) 10–15 (40%) 92.1 +4.76 1650 124.0 +23 -45 40.4% -0.69 28–43 (39%) 20–20 (50%) 98.5 +2.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.