H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cammy Macgregor vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-1
Cammy Macgregor holds a 2–1 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Cammy Macgregor leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1990 Oklahoma third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 1990* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nana Smith | 6-2 7-5 | Cammy Macgregor | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1990* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Cammy Macgregor | 6-4 6-3 | Nana Smith | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1989* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Cammy Macgregor | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cammy Macgregor | #625 | #75 | 14 | 1,605 | 48 | 87 | 35.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cammy Macgregor | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #77 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #188 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #166 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #198 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |