H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Candy Reynolds vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 0-4

Andrea Jaeger holds a 4–0 lead over Candy Reynolds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-3 7-6.

USA Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main-draw meetings
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 7-6 Candy Reynolds Match data Jun 15, 1983* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Andrea Jaeger 5-7 6-1 6-3 Candy Reynolds Match data Jan 6, 1983* R32 Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-0 Candy Reynolds Match data Dec 8, 1982* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Andrea Jaeger   Candy Reynolds Match data Jan 15, 1981* R32 Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Candy Reynolds — #76 5 1,825 85 141 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Candy Reynolds Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5
16 — — — — — — — 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8
17 — — — — — — — 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10
18 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11
19 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 0 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11
20 1975 2–6 25.0% — 1,464 0 0 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11
21 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,457 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11
22 1977 1–8 11.1% — 1,427 0 0 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11
23 1978 2–5 28.6% — 1,429 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1980 12–13 48.0% — 1,618 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1981 19–17 52.8% — 1,786 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1982 17–22 43.6% — 1,781 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1983 8–13 38.1% — 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1984 6–12 33.3% #109 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1985 6–9 40.0% — 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1986 6–16 27.3% #127 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1987 2–7 22.2% #177 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1988 1–6 14.3% #251 1,440 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Candy Reynolds Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1978 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 42 70 40.0% 10 35 45 22.2% 21 33 54 38.9% 23 27 50 46.0% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Candy Reynolds Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79
18 1973 1498 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.46 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08
19 1974 1487 97.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — +0.43 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43
20 1975 1465 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.94 0–2 1–1 — +0.25 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48
21 1976 1458 94.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1977 1427 98.6 — — — — — +29 — 26.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.63 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19
23 1978 1430 99.5 — — — — +149 +22 — 28.6% -1.64 — — — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 1619 126.0 — — — — +12 — -64 50.0% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 98.3 +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 1787 143.0 — — — — +13 -230 -171 51.9% +0.07 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 1781 138.7 — — — — -91 -231 -26 39.8% -0.77 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.1 -3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1698 121.4 — — — — -14 — — 45.0% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1627 111.2 — — — — +4 -103 +105 40.5% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1606 107.9 — — — — +52 — +37 44.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 +1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1548 124.2 — — — — +31 -67 +99 35.4% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1492 95.3 — — — — +51 -69 — 28.6% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1440 91.2 — — — — +52 — — 20.0% -2.47 0–1 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 1421 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1825 126.6 — — — — +1 -120 -29 40.7% -0.67 28–37 (43%) 19–22 (46%) 98.6 +0.82 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.