H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Candy Reynolds vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 0-1

Catherine Tanvier holds a 1–0 lead over Candy Reynolds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catherine Tanvier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catherine Tanvier won the 1982 Amelia Island Championships round of 64 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Candy Reynolds
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Catherine Tanvier 6-2 6-0 Candy Reynolds Match data Apr 21, 1982* R64 Amelia Island Championships WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Candy Reynolds — #76 5 1,825 85 141 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Catherine Tanvier — #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Candy Reynolds Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,801 0 0
18 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,827 0 0
19 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 0 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,778 0 0
20 1975 2–6 25.0% — 1,464 0 0 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,457 0 0 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0
22 1977 1–8 11.1% — 1,427 0 0 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,619 0 0
23 1978 2–5 28.6% — 1,429 0 0 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,674 0 0
25 1980 12–13 48.0% — 1,618 0 0 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0
26 1981 19–17 52.8% — 1,786 0 0 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 1982 17–22 43.6% — 1,781 0 0 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,614 0 0
28 1983 8–13 38.1% — 1,697 0 0 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0
29 1984 6–12 33.3% #109 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1985 6–9 40.0% — 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1986 6–16 27.3% #127 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1987 2–7 22.2% #177 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1988 1–6 14.3% #251 1,440 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Candy Reynolds Catherine Tanvier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
18 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6%
19 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
22 1977 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1978 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1982 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 42 70 40.0% 10 35 45 22.2% 21 33 54 38.9% 23 27 50 46.0% — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Candy Reynolds Catherine Tanvier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.78
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1541 110.4 — — — — +70 +73 +7 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1801 146.0 — — — — -101 -57 -142 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.01
18 1973 1498 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.46 1983 1827 138.9 — — — — +19 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.11
19 1974 1487 97.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — +0.43 1984 1779 138.5 — — — — +11 +66 -120 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.73
20 1975 1465 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.94 0–2 1–1 — +0.25 1985 1776 132.0 — — — — -9 +34 -112 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.50
21 1976 1458 94.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 1986 1826 142.1 — — — — +18 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.62
22 1977 1427 98.6 — — — — — +29 — 26.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.63 1987 1620 113.3 — — — — +55 +14 +54 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.21
23 1978 1430 99.5 — — — — +149 +22 — 28.6% -1.64 — — — +0.50 1988 1604 122.5 — — — — +8 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -0.94
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1674 141.1 — — — — -10 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.88
25 1980 1619 126.0 — — — — +12 — -64 50.0% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 98.3 +0.24 1990 1658 111.6 — — — — -1 -82 +74 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74
26 1981 1787 143.0 — — — — +13 -230 -171 51.9% +0.07 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.20 1991 1604 113.4 — — — — +31 -74 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59
27 1982 1781 138.7 — — — — -91 -231 -26 39.8% -0.77 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.1 -3.46 1992 1614 106.2 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48
28 1983 1698 121.4 — — — — -14 — — 45.0% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.55 1993 1579 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
29 1984 1627 111.2 — — — — +4 -103 +105 40.5% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1606 107.9 — — — — +52 — +37 44.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 +1.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1548 124.2 — — — — +31 -67 +99 35.4% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1492 95.3 — — — — +51 -69 — 28.6% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1440 91.2 — — — — +52 — — 20.0% -2.47 0–1 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 1421 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1825 126.6 — — — — +1 -120 -29 40.7% -0.67 28–37 (43%) 19–22 (46%) 98.6 +0.82 — 1880 137.1 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.