H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Candy Reynolds vs Kate Latham H2H: 2-1

Candy Reynolds holds a 2–1 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Candy Reynolds leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Candy Reynolds won the 1982 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Candy Reynolds
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Candy Reynolds 6-3 3-6 6-3 Kate Latham Match data May 26, 1982* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Candy Reynolds 7-6 4-6 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Sep 18, 1981* R16 Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Carpet
Kate Latham 6-2 6-2 Candy Reynolds Match data Jul 4, 1975* R16 Grossinger WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Candy Reynolds #485 #76 5 1,823 84 140 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Candy Reynolds Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1975 2–6 25.0% — 1,464 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,457 0 0 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1977 1–8 11.1% — 1,427 0 0 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,419 0 0 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1980 12–13 48.0% — 1,613 0 0 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 1981 19–17 52.8% — 1,784 0 0 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 1982 17–22 43.6% — 1,779 0 0 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 1983 8–13 38.1% — 1,696 0 0 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 1984 6–12 33.3% #109 1,626 0 0 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 1985 6–9 40.0% #107 1,605 0 0 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 1986 6–16 27.3% #127 1,547 0 0 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 1987 2–7 22.2% #177 1,491 0 0 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6
33 1988 1–6 14.3% #251 1,439 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 1989 0–2 0.0% #485 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Candy Reynolds Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1977 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1982 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1985 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 41 68 39.7% 10 35 45 22.2% 21 33 54 38.9% 23 27 50 46.0% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Candy Reynolds Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1973 1498 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 1487 97.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — +0.44 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1975 1465 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.94 0–2 1–1 — +0.27 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1976 1458 94.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1977 1428 98.6 — — — — — +29 — 26.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.66 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1978 1419 102.1 — — — — — +33 — 20.0% -2.00 — — — +0.25 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1980 1614 126.1 — — — — +14 — -59 50.0% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 98.3 +0.22 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 1981 1785 142.7 — — — — +14 -229 -170 51.9% +0.07 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 109.6 +0.26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 1982 1780 138.5 — — — — -91 -230 -26 39.8% -0.77 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.1 -3.82 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 1983 1697 121.3 — — — — -13 — — 45.0% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.59 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 1984 1626 111.1 — — — — +4 -102 +104 40.5% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.16 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 1985 1606 107.8 — — — — +51 — +36 44.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 +1.45 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 1986 1547 124.1 — — — — +31 -67 +100 35.4% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.71 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 1987 1492 95.2 — — — — +50 -70 — 28.6% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.56 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
33 1988 1440 91.2 — — — — +52 — — 20.0% -2.47 0–1 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 1421 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 126.8 — — — — -2 -119 -28 40.6% -0.67 28–37 (43%) 19–22 (46%) 98.6 +0.70 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.