H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Candy Reynolds vs Kathy Jordan H2H: 1-1

Candy Reynolds and Kathy Jordan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Candy Reynolds leads 1–0 on clay, while Kathy Jordan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Candy Reynolds won the 1981 Roland Garros round of 32 2-6 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Candy Reynolds
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kathy Jordan
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Candy Reynolds 2-6 7-5 6-2 Kathy Jordan Match data May 31, 1981* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Kathy Jordan 6-3 6-0 Candy Reynolds Match data Aug 22, 1980* R16 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Candy Reynolds #485 #76 5 1,823 84 140 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kathy Jordan #520 #5 44 2,093 249 155 61.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Candy Reynolds Kathy Jordan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 1978 4–3 57.1% — 1,560 0 0
19 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 0 1979 25–13 65.8% — 1,893 0 1
20 1975 2–6 25.0% — 1,464 0 0 1980 37–21 63.8% — 2,001 0 1
21 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,457 0 0 1981 28–20 58.3% — 1,921 0 1
22 1977 1–8 11.1% — 1,427 0 0 1982 21–18 53.8% — 1,884 0 2
23 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,419 0 0 1983 44–22 66.7% — 2,009 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1984 23–11 67.6% #10 2,023 0 2
25 1980 12–13 48.0% — 1,613 0 0 1985 28–15 65.1% #12 1,979 0 2
26 1981 19–17 52.8% — 1,784 0 0 1986 25–15 62.5% #15 1,910 0 2
27 1982 17–22 43.6% — 1,779 0 0 1987 12–10 54.5% #35 1,892 0 2
28 1983 8–13 38.1% — 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1984 6–12 33.3% #109 1,626 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,874 0 2
30 1985 6–9 40.0% #107 1,605 0 0 1990 2–6 25.0% #207 1,791 0 2
31 1986 6–16 27.3% #127 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1987 2–7 22.2% #177 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1988 1–6 14.3% #251 1,439 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 1989 0–2 0.0% #485 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Candy Reynolds Kathy Jordan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1979 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
20 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 10 4 14 71.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 19 12 31 61.3%
21 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 11 9 20 55.0%
22 1977 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
23 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 6 20 70.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1985 12 6 18 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 11 5 16 68.8%
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1986 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1982 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1987 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
28 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1990 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 41 68 39.7% 10 35 45 22.2% 21 33 54 38.9% 23 27 50 46.0% — 85 46 131 64.9% 20 18 38 52.6% 57 32 89 64.0% 87 59 146 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Candy Reynolds Kathy Jordan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1973 1498 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.48 1978 1561 118.9 — — — — — — +39 58.8% +0.71 1–2 (33%) — — +0.09
19 1974 1487 97.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — +0.44 1979 1894 155.9 — — — — +33 — -200 61.0% +1.00 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 104.2 +0.19
20 1975 1465 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.94 0–2 1–1 — +0.27 1980 2001 163.9 — — — — +36 -360 -260 63.3% +0.95 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 102.2 -5.58
21 1976 1458 94.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 1981 1921 148.1 — — — — +51 -258 -73 60.0% +0.90 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 97.1 +1.06
22 1977 1428 98.6 — — — — — +29 — 26.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.66 1982 1884 146.3 — — — — +58 -205 -59 53.2% +0.03 8–8 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -3.84
23 1978 1419 102.1 — — — — — +33 — 20.0% -2.00 — — — +0.25 1983 2010 155.5 — — — — -21 -247 -32 62.3% +1.00 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 103.8 -2.02
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 2024 159.6 — — — — -49 -276 +117 65.3% +1.16 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 -2.73
25 1980 1614 126.1 — — — — +14 — -59 50.0% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 98.3 +0.22 1985 1979 155.4 — — — — +58 — +38 59.8% +1.02 13–5 (72%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -2.92
26 1981 1785 142.7 — — — — +14 -229 -170 51.9% +0.07 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 109.6 +0.26 1986 1911 153.3 — — — — +58 — +131 62.2% +1.00 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 96.2 -1.31
27 1982 1780 138.5 — — — — -91 -230 -26 39.8% -0.77 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.1 -3.82 1987 1892 137.2 — — — — +45 — +97 56.3% +0.46 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 99.1 -1.65
28 1983 1697 121.3 — — — — -13 — — 45.0% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1626 111.1 — — — — +4 -102 +104 40.5% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.16 1989 1875 106.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.26
30 1985 1606 107.8 — — — — +51 — +36 44.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 +1.45 1990 1792 109.8 — — — — +34 — +142 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -1.37
31 1986 1547 124.1 — — — — +31 -67 +100 35.4% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1492 95.2 — — — — +50 -70 — 28.6% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1440 91.2 — — — — +52 — — 20.0% -2.47 0–1 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 1421 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 126.8 — — — — -2 -119 -28 40.6% -0.67 28–37 (43%) 19–22 (46%) 98.6 +0.70 — 2094 160.4 — — — — +32 -275 -8 59.9% +0.80 67–55 (55%) 35–31 (53%) 101.2 -5.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.