H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Candy Reynolds vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-2

Mima Jausovec holds a 2–0 lead over Candy Reynolds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1981 Roland Garros round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Candy Reynolds
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-3 6-2 Candy Reynolds Match data Jun 2, 1981* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Mima Jausovec 4-6 6-3 6-3 Candy Reynolds Match data Dec 5, 1980* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Candy Reynolds — #76 5 1,825 85 141 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mima Jausovec — #23 2 2,092 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Candy Reynolds Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 0 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,006 0 4
20 1975 2–6 25.0% — 1,464 0 0 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,457 0 0 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1977 1–8 11.1% — 1,427 0 0 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,872 1 6
23 1978 2–5 28.6% — 1,429 0 0 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,947 1 6
24 — — — — — — — 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,015 1 6
25 1980 12–13 48.0% — 1,618 0 0 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,859 1 7
26 1981 19–17 52.8% — 1,786 0 0 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,874 1 7
27 1982 17–22 43.6% — 1,781 0 0 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,748 1 7
28 1983 8–13 38.1% — 1,697 0 0 1985 9–12 42.9% — 1,695 1 7
29 1984 6–12 33.3% #109 1,626 0 0 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1985 6–9 40.0% — 1,606 0 0 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1986 6–16 27.3% #127 1,547 0 0 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7
32 1987 2–7 22.2% #177 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1988 1–6 14.3% #251 1,440 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Candy Reynolds Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1977 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1978 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1982 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1985 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 28 42 70 40.0% 10 35 45 22.2% 21 33 54 38.9% 23 27 50 46.0% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Candy Reynolds Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.17
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -2.15
18 1973 1498 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.46 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -2.20
19 1974 1487 97.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — +0.43 1976 2006 156.7 — — — — -269 +59 -235 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -4.08
20 1975 1465 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.94 0–2 1–1 — +0.25 1977 2011 161.8 — — — — -204 +129 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.46
21 1976 1458 94.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -139 +160 -130 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.1 -4.09
22 1977 1427 98.6 — — — — — +29 — 26.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.63 1979 1873 146.6 — — — — -11 +165 -111 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.9 +0.01
23 1978 1430 99.5 — — — — +149 +22 — 28.6% -1.64 — — — +0.50 1980 1947 156.3 — — — — +4 +49 -112 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.84
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2015 157.3 — — — — -1 +4 -104 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.23
25 1980 1619 126.0 — — — — +12 — -64 50.0% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 98.3 +0.24 1982 1859 148.8 — — — — +114 +111 -67 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 +1.20
26 1981 1787 143.0 — — — — +13 -230 -171 51.9% +0.07 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.20 1983 1875 144.0 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.60
27 1982 1781 138.7 — — — — -91 -231 -26 39.8% -0.77 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.1 -3.46 1984 1748 131.8 — — — — -26 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.24
28 1983 1698 121.4 — — — — -14 — — 45.0% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.55 1985 1696 127.7 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.55
29 1984 1627 111.2 — — — — +4 -103 +105 40.5% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.02 1986 1674 105.7 — — — — — +196 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.21
30 1985 1606 107.9 — — — — +52 — +37 44.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 +1.41 1987 1657 107.2 — — — — — +178 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.39
31 1986 1548 124.2 — — — — +31 -67 +99 35.4% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.65 1988 1642 110.1 — — — — — +161 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
32 1987 1492 95.3 — — — — +51 -69 — 28.6% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1440 91.2 — — — — +52 — — 20.0% -2.47 0–1 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 1421 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1825 126.6 — — — — +1 -120 -29 40.7% -0.67 28–37 (43%) 19–22 (46%) 98.6 +0.82 — 2093 156.2 — — — — -46 +105 -120 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -4.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.