H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Candy Reynolds vs Nathalie Herreman H2H: 2-1

Candy Reynolds holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Candy Reynolds leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Candy Reynolds won the 1986 Oklahoma quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Candy Reynolds
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Candy Reynolds 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #132 Match data Mar 1, 1986* QF Oklahoma WTA 250 Carpet
Candy Reynolds 6-3 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #131 Match data Feb 11, 1986* R128 Boca Raton WTA 250 Hard
Nathalie Herreman #111 6-2 6-2 Candy Reynolds Match data Jan 19, 1984* R32 Denver WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Candy Reynolds #485 #76 5 1,823 84 140 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Candy Reynolds Nathalie Herreman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0
18 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0
19 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,487 0 0 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0
20 1975 2–6 25.0% — 1,464 0 0 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
21 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,457 0 0 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
22 1977 1–8 11.1% — 1,427 0 0 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
23 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,419 0 0 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
25 1980 12–13 48.0% — 1,613 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
26 1981 19–17 52.8% — 1,784 0 0 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
27 1982 17–22 43.6% — 1,779 0 0 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
28 1983 8–13 38.1% — 1,696 0 0 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
29 1984 6–12 33.3% #109 1,626 0 0 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1
30 1985 6–9 40.0% #107 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1986 6–16 27.3% #127 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1987 2–7 22.2% #177 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1988 1–6 14.3% #251 1,439 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 1989 0–2 0.0% #485 1,421 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Candy Reynolds Nathalie Herreman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1975 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1977 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1981 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1982 2 5 7 28.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1984 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1985 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 41 68 39.7% 10 35 45 22.2% 21 33 54 38.9% 23 27 50 46.0% — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Candy Reynolds Nathalie Herreman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65
18 1973 1498 97.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — +0.48 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16
19 1974 1487 97.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.50 — — — +0.44 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91
20 1975 1465 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.94 0–2 1–1 — +0.27 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
21 1976 1458 94.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.04 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
22 1977 1428 98.6 — — — — — +29 — 26.3% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.1 +0.66 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90
23 1978 1419 102.1 — — — — — +33 — 20.0% -2.00 — — — +0.25 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
25 1980 1614 126.1 — — — — +14 — -59 50.0% -0.18 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 98.3 +0.22 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
26 1981 1785 142.7 — — — — +14 -229 -170 51.9% +0.07 7–4 (64%) 4–2 (67%) 109.6 +0.26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
27 1982 1780 138.5 — — — — -91 -230 -26 39.8% -0.77 8–3 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.1 -3.82 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45
28 1983 1697 121.3 — — — — -13 — — 45.0% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.59 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34
29 1984 1626 111.1 — — — — +4 -102 +104 40.5% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 1–1 — +0.16 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22
30 1985 1606 107.8 — — — — +51 — +36 44.4% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 +1.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1547 124.1 — — — — +31 -67 +100 35.4% -0.77 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1987 1492 95.2 — — — — +50 -70 — 28.6% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1988 1440 91.2 — — — — +52 — — 20.0% -2.47 0–1 1–0 — +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1989 1421 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 126.8 — — — — -2 -119 -28 40.6% -0.67 28–37 (43%) 19–22 (46%) 98.6 +0.70 — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.