H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Cara Black vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 1-0
Cara Black holds a 1–0 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cara Black leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cara Black won the 1999 Oklahoma fourth round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 1999* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Cara Black | 7-6 7-6 | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |