H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Cara Black vs Amanda Hopmans H2H: 2-0

Cara Black holds a 2–0 lead over Amanda Hopmans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cara Black leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cara Black won the 2000 ASB Classic semifinal 6-3 6-3.

ZIM Age 47 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 0
2 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cara Black #50 6-3 6-3 Amanda Hopmans #83 Match data Jan 8, 2000* SF ASB Classic Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Cara Black #36 7-6 6-2 Amanda Hopmans #88 Match data Jun 10, 1999* R32 Birmingham Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cara Black #679 #31 869 1,772 115 152 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amanda Hopmans #978 #72 411 1,603 23 36 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cara Black Amanda Hopmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1998 10–10 50.0% #44 1,614 0 0
20 1999 17–22 43.6% #50 1,629 0 0
21 2000 22–21 51.2% #41 1,749 0 0
22 2001 19–25 43.2% #58 1,635 0 0
23 2002 20–21 48.8% #56 1,620 0 1 1999 9–13 40.9% #83 1,549 0 0
24 2003 18–25 41.9% #51 1,602 0 1 2000 12–16 42.9% #103 1,538 0 0
25 2004 6–21 22.2% #138 1,473 0 1 2001 2–7 22.2% #162 1,518 0 0
26 2005 2–2 50.0% #179 1,504 0 1
27 2006 1–3 25.0% #288 1,507 0 1
29 2008 0–2 0.0% #660 1,489 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cara Black Amanda Hopmans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1998 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1999 9 10 19 47.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2000 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2002 13 12 25 52.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2003 10 17 27 37.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 65 84 149 43.6% 23 36 59 39.0% 23 21 44 52.3% 4 11 15 26.7% 5 10 15 33.3% 9 17 26 34.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cara Black Amanda Hopmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1998 1614 118.9 -37 -49 +50 45.8% -0.23 6–2 (75%) 1–1 -0.28
20 1999 1630 136.6 -24 -50 +28 43.5% -0.29 4–7 (36%) 6–6 (50%) 100.2 -1.66
21 2000 1749 143.8 -39 -180 +62 55.2% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 -2.05
22 2001 1635 138.8 +19 -20 +157 46.7% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 8–6 (57%) 99.0 -1.26
23 2002 1621 125.1 +47 -45 +121 46.7% -0.19 7–5 (58%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -1.04 1999 1549 120.0 +66 -49 +37 40.4% -0.70 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.43
24 2003 1602 117.3 +0.23 +1.08 1.019 50.5% -36 +25 +132 41.3% -0.68 4–2 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 103.9 -0.01 2000 1539 112.0 +42 -22 +11 49.2% -0.03 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 93.0 +1.81
25 2004 1473 105.4 -1.30 -2.07 0.845 46.8% +51 +28 +150 26.6% -1.61 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 +0.84 2001 1518 107.4 +27 -16 25.0% -2.00 1–1 0–1 -0.79
26 2005 1505 103.0 +1.03 +0.05 0.933 48.7% +144 55.6% +0.22 0–1 1–0 +0.03
27 2006 1508 106.0 +1.65 -0.27 1.032 50.5% -8 33.3% -1.56 0–1 1–0 -0.19
29 2008 1490 104.2 -0.59 -0.88 0.598 38.4% 0.0% -3.50 +0.07
Career 1773 132.7 -0.06 -0.53 0.909 48.1% -2 -37 +94 44.2% -0.38 38–44 (46%) 30–30 (50%) 102.4 -2.09 1604 115.7 +47 -30 +24 42.1% -0.59 5–9 (36%) 2–7 (22%) 91.2 +1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.