H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Cara Black vs Cindy Watson H2H: 1-0

Cara Black holds a 1–0 lead over Cindy Watson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cara Black leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cara Black won the 2003 Hobart International round of 32 6-2 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cara Black
ZIM Age 47 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Cindy Watson
AUS Age 48 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cara Black #55 6-2 7-6(4) Cindy Watson #173 Match data Jan 9, 2003* R32 Hobart International Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cara Black #679 #31 869 1,772 115 152 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Cindy Watson #1,118 #131 246 1,548 3 6 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cara Black Cindy Watson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1998 10–10 50.0% #44 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 17–22 43.6% #50 1,629 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2000 22–21 51.2% #41 1,749 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #302 1,499 0 0
22 2001 19–25 43.2% #58 1,635 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2002 20–21 48.8% #56 1,620 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2003 18–25 41.9% #51 1,602 0 1 2002 3–2 60.0% #161 1,531 0 0
25 2004 6–21 22.2% #138 1,473 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #600 1,519 0 0
26 2005 2–2 50.0% #179 1,504 0 1 2004 0–1 0.0% #294 1,516 0 0
27 2006 1–3 25.0% #288 1,507 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #328 1,498 0 0
29 2008 0–2 0.0% #660 1,489 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cara Black Cindy Watson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1998 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 9 10 19 47.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 12 15 27 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 13 12 25 52.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 10 17 27 37.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2002 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2004 5 11 16 31.3% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 84 149 43.6% 23 36 59 39.0% 23 21 44 52.3% 4 11 15 26.7% — 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 14/80 of Cara Black's and 1/1 of Cindy Watson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cara Black Cindy Watson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 4/43 1.5 3.5 54.8% 62.1% 45.7% 49.5% 58.8% 54.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 5/27 1.8 3.0 57.9% 58.7% 44.2% 50.1% 54.2% 52.3% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 2/4 1.5 3.5 66.4% 59.8% 45.7% 55.6% 67.5% 55.1% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 2/4 0.5 3.0 62.1% 57.8% 52.8% 45.2% 53.6% 55.8% 45.6% 2005 1/1 0.0 5.0 77.9% 50.7% 36.8% 41.7% 30.8% 47.7% 43.8%
29 2008 1/2 1.0 3.0 62.0% 51.6% 26.3% 44.4% 100.0% 42.0% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 14/267 1.4 3.2 59.1% 59.2% 44.8% 49.6% 60.6% 53.1% 42.6% — 1/9 0.0 5.0 77.9% 50.7% 36.8% 41.7% 30.8% 47.7% 43.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cara Black Cindy Watson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1998 1614 118.9 — — — — -37 -49 +50 45.8% -0.23 6–2 (75%) 1–1 — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1630 136.6 — — — — -24 -50 +28 43.5% -0.29 4–7 (36%) 6–6 (50%) 100.2 -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 1749 143.8 — — — — -39 -180 +62 55.2% +0.39 5–9 (36%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 -2.05 1999 1499 109.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.26
22 2001 1635 138.8 — — — — +19 -20 +157 46.7% -0.22 7–12 (37%) 8–6 (57%) 99.0 -1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 1621 125.1 — — — — +47 -45 +121 46.7% -0.19 7–5 (58%) 1–4 (20%) 99.4 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 1602 117.3 +0.23 +1.08 1.019 50.5% -36 +25 +132 41.3% -0.68 4–2 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 103.9 -0.01 2002 1531 110.0 — — — — +31 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 — — +0.44
25 2004 1473 105.4 -1.30 -2.07 0.845 46.8% +51 +28 +150 26.6% -1.61 5–5 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 +0.84 2003 1519 101.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.07
26 2005 1505 103.0 +1.03 +0.05 0.933 48.7% — — +144 55.6% +0.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.03 2004 1516 107.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.19
27 2006 1508 106.0 +1.65 -0.27 1.032 50.5% -8 — — 33.3% -1.56 0–1 1–0 — -0.19 2005 1498 97.2 -0.34 -0.77 0.836 45.8% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.24
29 2008 1490 104.2 -0.59 -0.88 0.598 38.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1773 132.7 -0.06 -0.53 0.909 48.1% -2 -37 +94 44.2% -0.38 38–44 (46%) 30–30 (50%) 102.4 -2.09 — 1549 111.0 -0.34 -0.77 0.836 45.8% +31 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 0–2 — +1.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.