H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Cara Black vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 0-2
Emmanuelle Gagliardi holds a 2–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emmanuelle Gagliardi won the 2004 Berlin second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2004* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 6-1 6-3 | Cara Black | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 7-6(3) 6-0 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |