H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cara Black vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 1-3
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 3–1 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Cara Black leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1999 US Open first round 6-3 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-3 5-7 6-3 | Cara Black | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1999* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 6-4 | Cara Black | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1999* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Cara Black | 6-2 6-1 | Julie Halard-Decugis | Match data |
| Jan 16, 1999* | Hobart | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |