H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cara Black vs Lenka Nemeckova H2H: 1-1
Cara Black and Lenka Nemeckova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lenka Nemeckova leads 1–0 on clay, while Cara Black leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cara Black won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Cara Black | 6-4 7-6(4) | Lenka Nemeckova | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1998* | Makarska | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Lenka Nemeckova | 6-2 7-5 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lenka Nemeckova | #787 | #72 | 337 | 1,570 | 27 | 46 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Lenka Nemeckova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #155 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #136 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |