H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Cara Black vs Martina Müller H2H: 1-0
Cara Black holds a 1–0 lead over Martina Müller in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cara Black leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cara Black won the 2002 Oporto third round 6-3 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2002* | Oporto | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Cara Black | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Martina Müller | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martina Müller | #808 | #33 | 702 | 1,647 | 62 | 107 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Martina Müller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #336 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,422 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #34 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 16–28 | 36.4% | #53 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,441 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |