Cara Black
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 13, 2003 | H2H |
| Kim Clijsters | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 20, 2003 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 23, 2002 | H2H |
| Rita Grande | 5 | 0 | 5 | Jun 9, 2004 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 16, 2002 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Cara Black holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cara Black leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cara Black won the 2000 Bol round of 32 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | 6-3 6-2 | Miriam Oremans | Match data | May 4, 2000* | R32 | Bol | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,772 | 115 | 152 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,808 | 162 | 182 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #138 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,507 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #64 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Cara Black | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1992 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1999 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1993 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 2000 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1994 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 22 | 2001 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1995 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2002 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 24 | 2003 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 37.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 25 | 2004 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1998 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2006 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 65 | 84 | 149 | 43.6% | 23 | 36 | 59 | 39.0% | 23 | 21 | 44 | 52.3% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% | — | 61 | 85 | 146 | 41.8% | 28 | 43 | 71 | 39.4% | 53 | 33 | 86 | 61.6% | 20 | 21 | 41 | 48.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Cara Black | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1520 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.11 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1472 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +51 | — | 29.6% | -1.00 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.66 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1614 | 118.9 | — | — | — | — | -37 | -49 | +50 | 45.8% | -0.23 | 6–2 (75%) | 1–1 | — | -0.28 | 1992 | 1532 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | -24 | 38.6% | -0.80 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–1 | — | +0.45 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1630 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | -24 | -50 | +28 | 43.5% | -0.29 | 4–7 (36%) | 6–6 (50%) | 100.2 | -1.66 | 1993 | 1747 | 146.5 | — | — | — | — | -74 | -220 | +26 | 59.1% | +0.56 | 7–14 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | 97.4 | +0.65 |
| 21 | 2000 | 1749 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -39 | -180 | +62 | 55.2% | +0.39 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–5 (50%) | 99.4 | -2.05 | 1994 | 1733 | 131.3 | — | — | — | — | -44 | -192 | +24 | 46.8% | -0.26 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–7 (42%) | 96.7 | +0.41 |
| 22 | 2001 | 1635 | 138.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -20 | +157 | 46.7% | -0.22 | 7–12 (37%) | 8–6 (57%) | 99.0 | -1.26 | 1995 | 1769 | 143.9 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -170 | -22 | 50.0% | +0.10 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–7 (46%) | 104.5 | -0.91 |
| 23 | 2002 | 1621 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | +47 | -45 | +121 | 46.7% | -0.19 | 7–5 (58%) | 1–4 (20%) | 99.4 | -1.04 | 1996 | 1714 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -67 | +161 | 48.1% | +0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–5 (44%) | 100.2 | +0.41 |
| 24 | 2003 | 1602 | 117.3 | +0.23 | +1.08 | 1.019 | 50.5% | -36 | +25 | +132 | 41.3% | -0.68 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–3 (57%) | 103.9 | -0.01 | 1997 | 1774 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -189 | +117 | 47.9% | +0.10 | 8–7 (53%) | 2–7 (22%) | 99.3 | -1.65 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1473 | 105.4 | -1.30 | -2.07 | 0.845 | 46.8% | +51 | +28 | +150 | 26.6% | -1.61 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–5 (38%) | 98.4 | +0.84 | 1998 | 1728 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -132 | +210 | 41.5% | -0.65 | 6–1 (86%) | 5–7 (42%) | 102.7 | -0.25 |
| 26 | 2005 | 1505 | 103.0 | +1.03 | +0.05 | 0.933 | 48.7% | — | — | +144 | 55.6% | +0.22 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.03 | 1999 | 1628 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -17 | -126 | +239 | 34.0% | -1.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -1.78 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1508 | 106.0 | +1.65 | -0.27 | 1.032 | 50.5% | -8 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.56 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.19 | 2000 | 1711 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -186 | +166 | 53.5% | +0.13 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–3 (57%) | 103.0 | +0.23 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1690 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | -15 | -187 | +242 | 43.3% | -0.55 | 8–3 (73%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.2 | -1.04 |
| 29 | 2008 | 1490 | 104.2 | -0.59 | -0.88 | 0.598 | 38.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.07 | 2002 | 1613 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -157 | +280 | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 93.7 | +0.42 |
| Career | — | 1773 | 132.7 | -0.06 | -0.53 | 0.909 | 48.1% | -2 | -37 | +94 | 44.2% | -0.38 | 38–44 (46%) | 30–30 (50%) | 102.4 | -2.09 | — | 1808 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -145 | +138 | 46.8% | -0.19 | 59–52 (53%) | 34–51 (40%) | 97.2 | -0.73 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 13, 2003 | H2H |
| Kim Clijsters | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jun 20, 2003 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 23, 2002 | H2H |
| Rita Grande | 5 | 0 | 5 | Jun 9, 2004 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 16, 2002 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 10, 1999 | H2H |
| Sandrine Testud | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 23, 2001 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 22, 2000 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 2, 1998 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 21, 2002 | H2H |