H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cara Black vs Paola Suarez H2H: 0-2
Paola Suarez holds a 2–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paola Suarez leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2003 Miami second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2003* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Paola Suarez | 6-1 6-0 | Cara Black | Match data |
| May 16, 2001* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |