H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cara Black vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 0-2
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 2–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 2000 Rome second round 1-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2000* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Cara Black | Match data |
| Mar 7, 1998* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-3 6-3 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |