H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cara Black vs Selima Sfar H2H: 1-0
Cara Black holds a 1–0 lead over Selima Sfar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cara Black leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cara Black won the 2002 Indian Wells first round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Cara Black | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Selima Sfar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Selima Sfar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |