H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Cara Black vs Steffi Graf H2H: 0-1
Steffi Graf holds a 1–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steffi Graf leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Steffi Graf won the 1999 Berlin fourth round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 1999* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Steffi Graf | 7-6 6-2 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,770 | 114 | 149 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Steffi Graf | #3 | #1 | 5,028 | 2,600 | 866 | 109 | 88.8% | 22 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 50 | 106 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cara Black | Steffi Graf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #22 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 40–13 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,037 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 63–6 | 91.3% | #3 | 2,329 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 70–2 | 97.2% | #1 | 2,505 | 1 | 19 |
| 19 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 68–3 | 95.8% | #1 | 2,535 | 5 | 29 |
| 20 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 85–2 | 97.7% | #1 | 2,584 | 8 | 43 |
| 21 | 2000 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 72–5 | 93.5% | #1 | 2,510 | 9 | 53 |
| 22 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 64–8 | 88.9% | #2 | 2,418 | 10 | 60 |
| 23 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 61–6 | 91.0% | #2 | 2,448 | 11 | 68 |
| 24 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 77–5 | 93.9% | #1 | 2,510 | 14 | 78 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–20 | 20.0% | #138 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 58–6 | 90.6% | #1 | 2,417 | 15 | 85 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,491 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 48–2 | 96.0% | #1 | 2,466 | 18 | 94 |
| 27 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 51–4 | 92.7% | #1 | 2,446 | 21 | 101 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 16–4 | 80.0% | #28 | 2,353 | 21 | 102 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #9 | 2,284 | 21 | 105 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #3 | 2,242 | 22 | 106 |