H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Carin Bakkum vs Donna Faber H2H: 0-2
Donna Faber holds a 2–0 lead over Carin Bakkum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1990 Birmingham second round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1990* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Donna Faber | 7-6 6-3 | Carin Bakkum | Match data |
| Jan 18, 1989* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Donna Faber | 6-1 6-0 | Carin Bakkum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carin Bakkum | — | — | — | 1,500 | 11 | 32 | 25.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carin Bakkum | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1987 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1988 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,408 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |