H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Carin Bakkum vs Donna Faber H2H: 0-2

Donna Faber holds a 2–0 lead over Carin Bakkum in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1990 Birmingham round of 64 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carin Bakkum
NED Age 64
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Donna Faber
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Faber #62 7-6 6-3 Carin Bakkum Match data Jun 13, 1990* R64 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Donna Faber #131 6-1 6-0 Carin Bakkum Match data Jan 18, 1989* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carin Bakkum — — — 1,500 11 32 25.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carin Bakkum Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,470 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1987 1–6 14.3% — 1,430 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1988 3–8 27.3% — 1,412 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1989 5–10 33.3% — 1,441 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1990 1–3 25.0% — 1,440 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,427 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,408 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,424 0 0 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carin Bakkum Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1496 103.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.17 — — — +0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1532 112.2 — — — — +4 +14 — 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 — +0.30
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1675 137.0 — — — — +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1631 115.4 — — — — -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.90
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1593 109.9 — — — — -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1542 119.9 — — — — +26 +37 — 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1432 94.2 — — — — +34 — — 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1985 1485 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1986 1470 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1987 1431 103.1 — — — — — +55 — 25.0% -1.50 0–2 0–2 — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1988 1412 97.2 — — — — +73 — — 28.0% -1.20 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1989 1441 97.9 — — — — +58 — +102 32.3% -2.00 1–0 3–0 (100%) — +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1990 1440 99.3 — — — — +56 — — 25.0% -1.25 — 0–2 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1991 1428 98.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1993 1409 91.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1994 1425 104.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1500 96.5 — — — — +64 +55 +102 28.0% -1.67 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 +7.44 — 1719 121.4 — — — — +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.