H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Carina Karlsson vs Emiko Okagawa H2H: 1-1
Carina Karlsson and Emiko Okagawa are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emiko Okagawa leads 1–0 on carpet, while Carina Karlsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1986 Taipei third round 6-2 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1986* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Emiko Okagawa | 6-2 1-6 6-3 | Carina Karlsson | Match data |
| May 14, 1986* | Berlin | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Carina Karlsson | 6-2 4-6 7-6 | Emiko Okagawa | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carina Karlsson | — | — | — | 1,718 | 43 | 69 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Emiko Okagawa | — | — | — | 1,523 | 18 | 39 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carina Karlsson | Emiko Okagawa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,419 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 6–19 | 24.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |