H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Carina Witthoeft vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 2-0
Carina Witthoeft holds a 2–0 lead over Irina Falconi Hartman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carina Witthoeft leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carina Witthoeft won the 2017 Budapest fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Carina Witthoeft | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
| Jan 7, 2017 | Sydney | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Irina Falconi Hartman | 6-4 6-2 | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2016* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Carina Witthoeft | 0-6 6-4 6-4 | Irina Falconi Hartman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Carina Witthoeft | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |