H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Carina Witthoeft vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 1-1
Carina Witthoeft and Mirjana Lucic-Baroni are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carina Witthoeft leads 1–0 on grass, while Mirjana Lucic-Baroni leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carina Witthoeft won the 2017 Wimbledon first round 6-3 5-7 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 44
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2017* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Carina Witthoeft | 6-3 5-7 8-6 | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2015* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | 6-4 7-6(3) | Carina Witthoeft | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carina Witthoeft | #1,212 | #48 | 1,093 | 1,745 | 49 | 69 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | #424 | #20 | 1,924 | 1,798 | 136 | 166 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Carina Witthoeft | Mirjana Lucic-Baroni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–3 | 78.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,776 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #48 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #64 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #202 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #192 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #203 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #170 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #455 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,519 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #96 | 1,554 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,551 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #60 | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #68 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #80 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #327 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |