H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 1-1

Carla Suárez Navarro and Alison Riske-Amritraj are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 1–0 on clay, while Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alison Riske-Amritraj won the 2015 Stanford fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carla Suárez Navarro
ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Alison Riske-Amritraj
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 2015* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #59 6-4 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #10 Match data
May 8, 2014* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Carla Suárez Navarro #14 6-2 6-4 Alison Riske-Amritraj #46 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,853 191 202 48.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,529 0 0
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,488 0 0
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,642 0 0
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,713 0 1
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,742 0 1
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 2017 21–24 46.7% #70 1,650 0 1
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,632 0 1
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2019 26–23 53.1% #18 1,797 0 2
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,739 0 2
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2 2021 16–15 51.6% #51 1,771 0 3
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,750 0 3
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,614 0 3