H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 1-2

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 2–1 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2012 Hobart third round 6-2 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carla Suárez Navarro
ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 12, 2012* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 6-2 7-6(3) Carla Suárez Navarro #58 Match data
Feb 26, 2011* Acapulco WTA 250 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #92 6-2 2-2 (ret.) Carla Suárez Navarro #58 Match data
Jan 27, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #46 6-3 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2 — — — — — — —