H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Jelena Jankovic H2H: 3-5

Jelena Jankovic holds a 5–3 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Jelena Jankovic leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2016 US Open second round 6-1 6-4.

ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #12 6-1 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #40 Match data
Oct 4, 2013* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Jelena Jankovic #11 6-0 6-0 Carla Suárez Navarro #15 Match data
Oct 5, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R16 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #46 7-5 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #26 Match data
May 9, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Carla Suárez Navarro #45 4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #18 Match data
Jan 5, 2012* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Jelena Jankovic #14 6-4 6-2 Carla Suárez Navarro #56 Match data
Apr 12, 2009* Marbella WTA 250 F Clay Jelena Jankovic #4 6-3 3-6 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #34 Match data
Jun 26, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jelena Jankovic #3 6-1 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #56 Match data
Jun 4, 2008* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Jelena Jankovic #3 6-3 6-2 Carla Suárez Navarro #132 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Jelena Jankovic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15