H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Kateryna Volodko H2H: 2-2

Carla Suárez Navarro and Kateryna Volodko are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Carla Suárez Navarro leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Kateryna Volodko leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2018 Doha second round 3-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carla Suárez Navarro
ESP Age 37 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 39 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 14, 2018* Doha WTA 1000 R64 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #29 3-6 6-3 6-3 Kateryna Volodko #80 Match data
Sep 24, 2015* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Carla Suárez Navarro #10 7-6(3) 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #83 Match data
Sep 17, 2015* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Kateryna Volodko #85 6-4 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #12 Match data
Jul 16, 2011* Bad Gastein WTA 250 QF Clay Kateryna Volodko #88 6-2 6-1 Carla Suárez Navarro #103 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,022 339 247 57.8% 0 1 0 0 1 2
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,801 137 187 42.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Kateryna Volodko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,536 0 0
19 2008 13–11 54.2% #49 1,567 0 0 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,630 0 0
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2008 15–18 45.5% #62 1,646 0 1
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,769 0 1
23 2012 23–24 48.9% #34 1,676 0 0 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,665 0 1
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,812 0 0 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,719 0 1
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,835 0 1 2012 7–11 38.9% #136 1,659 0 1
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,787 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2016 35–19 64.8% #12 1,812 0 2 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,619 0 1
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,749 0 2 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,606 0 1
29 2018 27–19 58.7% #23 1,826 0 2 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,742 0 2 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,653 0 2
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,717 0 2 2018 3–11 21.4% #132 1,568 0 2
32 2021 0–3 0.0% #342 1,688 0 2 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,537 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,510 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,530 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,550 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,541 0 2