H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Carla Suárez Navarro vs Venus Williams H2H: 4-7

Venus Williams holds a 7–4 lead over Carla Suárez Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 5–3 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Carla Suárez Navarro won the 2019 Canadian Open first round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carla Suárez Navarro
ESP Age 38 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"
H2H
4 – 7
11 main-draw meetings
Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carla Suárez Navarro #26 6-4 6-2 Venus Williams #56 Match data Aug 7, 2019* R64 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #43 7-6(4) 6-1 Carla Suárez Navarro #29 Match data Mar 22, 2019* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #8 6-3 6-2 Carla Suárez Navarro #27 Match data Mar 16, 2018* QF Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #9 6-3 3-6 6-1 Carla Suárez Navarro #35 Match data Sep 5, 2017* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #8 7-6(3) 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #12 Match data Jul 5, 2016* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Venus Williams #24 6-3 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #10 Match data Oct 1, 2015* R16 Wuhan Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Carla Suárez Navarro #12 0-6 6-1 7-5 Venus Williams #16 Match data Apr 3, 2015* QF Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #26 4-6 6-2 6-3 Carla Suárez Navarro #16 Match data Aug 9, 2014* QF Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Carla Suárez Navarro #14 6-4 6-2 Venus Williams #32 Match data May 15, 2014* R32 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Venus Williams #3 6-0 6-4 Carla Suárez Navarro #34 Match data Jun 28, 2009* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Carla Suárez Navarro #46 2-6 6-3 7-5 Venus Williams #6 Match data Jan 22, 2009* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carla Suárez Navarro #342 #6 4,015 2,031 343 253 57.6% 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3
19 2008 13–12 52.0% #49 1,556 0 0 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9
20 2009 29–25 53.7% #33 1,648 0 0 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15
21 2010 21–14 60.0% #57 1,696 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21
22 2011 15–12 55.6% #56 1,682 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28
23 2012 24–25 49.0% #34 1,685 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29
24 2013 41–26 61.2% #17 1,811 0 0 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31
25 2014 50–25 66.7% #17 1,829 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33
26 2015 41–25 62.1% #13 1,792 0 1 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33
27 2016 37–21 63.8% #12 1,804 0 2 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36
28 2017 26–23 53.1% #40 1,747 0 2 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39
29 2018 27–20 57.4% #23 1,812 0 2 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41
30 2019 16–18 47.1% #54 1,740 0 2 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43
31 2020 2–3 40.0% #84 1,716 0 2 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43
32 2021 1–4 20.0% #342 1,706 0 2 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Venus Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
20 2009 11 12 23 47.8% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — — — — — 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2011 8 8 16 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
24 2013 17 16 33 51.5% 16 7 23 69.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2014 30 17 47 63.8% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
26 2015 27 18 45 60.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2016 23 14 37 62.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
28 2017 11 13 24 45.8% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
29 2018 21 13 34 61.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 2019 8 11 19 42.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
31 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 2021 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 182 156 338 53.8% 131 69 200 65.5% 27 25 52 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 519/597 of Carla Suárez Navarro's and 581/732 of Venus Williams's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Venus Williams
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2008 10/25 1.1 2.4 67.8% 60.0% 45.9% 46.1% 56.5% 55.3% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2009 44/54 0.6 2.3 68.3% 58.3% 43.5% 48.8% 57.2% 53.5% 45.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2010 32/35 0.5 2.6 69.2% 60.2% 45.3% 57.5% 52.8% 55.6% 48.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2011 23/27 0.6 2.7 66.8% 58.5% 43.8% 46.3% 51.3% 53.5% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2012 44/49 0.7 2.8 61.3% 57.8% 45.9% 47.7% 47.8% 53.5% 46.8% 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3%
24 2013 61/67 0.7 1.8 68.3% 59.6% 44.8% 49.5% 45.2% 54.8% 46.3% 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1%
25 2014 66/75 0.8 1.8 71.5% 61.3% 48.8% 59.3% 55.0% 57.6% 47.4% 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1%
26 2015 53/66 1.1 2.2 68.4% 59.9% 49.2% 52.3% 44.1% 56.5% 43.7% 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5%
27 2016 53/59 1.5 2.2 67.9% 65.0% 48.9% 55.9% 46.3% 59.6% 46.1% 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6%
28 2017 49/49 1.0 1.3 69.0% 61.2% 46.6% 51.4% 50.3% 56.7% 47.3% 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0%
29 2018 42/47 1.4 1.6 63.9% 63.3% 48.7% 48.5% 44.2% 57.8% 42.7% 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1%
30 2019 34/34 1.3 1.7 64.4% 61.0% 44.3% 53.0% 50.2% 54.9% 44.9% 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4%
31 2020 5/5 0.4 0.8 67.5% 62.6% 39.7% 54.8% 49.0% 54.7% 42.0% 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7%
32 2021 3/5 0.7 2.7 62.4% 55.1% 59.1% 31.7% 39.8% 56.1% 29.8% 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5%
44 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9%
45 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7%
46 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0%
Career — 519/597 0.9 2.0 67.5% 60.7% 46.7% 52.0% 49.4% 56.0% 45.8% — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carla Suárez Navarro Venus Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -1.92
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 108.8 -0.82
19 2008 1556 116.3 +0.04 -0.08 0.990 49.7% -80 +117 — 54.7% +0.13 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 99.2 +0.94 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 105.8 -4.08
20 2009 1648 129.9 -1.19 +1.22 0.973 49.5% -65 +60 +12 53.2% +0.02 10–8 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.7 +0.91 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 106.2 -2.30
21 2010 1696 132.9 -0.35 +4.10 1.091 51.9% -34 +34 — 56.1% +0.49 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -0.61 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) 106.1 -1.53
22 2011 1683 118.9 -1.15 +1.17 0.992 49.9% -34 +61 — 57.1% +0.23 4–2 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 101.9 +1.59 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -2.34
23 2012 1685 129.6 -1.52 +2.21 1.006 50.0% -29 +66 -60 48.0% -0.18 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 -1.48 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 -1.73
24 2013 1812 143.2 -0.34 +2.87 1.025 50.5% -61 +74 -102 58.9% +0.40 10–7 (59%) 7–3 (70%) 105.3 -0.62 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 99.4 +0.68
25 2014 1829 148.3 +1.78 +3.55 1.120 52.6% -6 +106 -121 64.0% +0.85 13–9 (59%) 11–5 (69%) 105.5 +1.61 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 -2.36
26 2015 1793 149.4 -0.63 +3.13 1.005 49.9% +26 +174 -122 55.3% +0.19 19–7 (73%) 11–4 (73%) 110.8 -1.27 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.08
27 2016 1804 145.7 +3.33 +2.65 1.140 52.6% +4 +149 -65 59.6% +0.74 15–9 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 101.4 +1.43 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -1.59
28 2017 1748 140.2 +0.64 +3.29 1.091 51.9% -5 +164 -30 52.8% +0.53 5–7 (42%) 2–8 (20%) 90.1 -1.34 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 -1.46
29 2018 1813 142.4 +1.11 +0.48 1.013 50.2% +26 +26 -114 50.0% -0.15 10–4 (71%) 6–5 (55%) 107.3 +0.39 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) 88.0 -2.55
30 2019 1741 136.0 -1.30 +1.97 0.995 49.8% +15 +75 -3 50.0% -0.04 4–6 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 96.4 +1.09 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 +0.82
31 2020 1716 126.2 +1.52 +0.87 0.929 48.4% +14 — — 50.0% -0.50 0–2 2–0 — -0.54 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19
32 2021 1706 123.3 +1.01 +0.12 0.680 43.7% +26 — — 38.5% -1.15 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 97.3 -0.97 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 99.5 -1.94
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 92.5 -0.63
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) 93.1 +0.59
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 95.7 +1.30
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1941 149.8 +3.49 +3.26 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) 106.7 -0.36
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.67
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 -1.42
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.8 -1.11
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 95.5 -0.01
Career — 2031 144.8 +0.25 +2.46 1.041 50.8% -12 +94 -70 55.5% +0.30 107–78 (58%) 66–48 (58%) 107.8 +0.19 — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.2 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.